【24h】

Validity and reliability of web accessibility guidelines

机译:网络可访问性指南的有效性和可靠性

获取原文

摘要

Although widely used,Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) have not been studied from the viewpoint of their validity and reliability. WCAG 2.0 explicitly claim that they are based on "testable" criteria, but no scientific evidence exists that this is actually the case. Validity (how well all and only the true problems can be identified) and reliability (the extent to which different evaluations of the same page lead to same results) are key factors for quality of accessibility evaluation methods. They need to be well studied and understood for methods, and guidelines, that are expected to have a major impact.
机译:尽管已广泛使用,但尚未从WebWeb的有效性和可靠性的角度研究Web Content Accessibility Guidelines(WCAG)。 WCAG 2.0明确声称它们基于“可测试”的标准,但是没有科学证据表明确实如此。有效性(确定所有问题以及只有真正的问题的程度)和可靠性(同一页的不同评估导致相同结果的程度)是可访问性评估方法质量的关键因素。需要对它们进行充分的研究和理解,以期获得预期会产生重大影响的方法和指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号