首页> 外文会议>World environmental and water resources congress >Predicting Cumulative Stream Power in Ungaged, Rural Watersheds
【24h】

Predicting Cumulative Stream Power in Ungaged, Rural Watersheds

机译:预测累积的农村流域中的累积流力量

获取原文

摘要

The vast majority locations where an assessment of historical stream power might be required (e.g., bridge sites) do not have the stream flow gage data needed for calculations. This paper describes and illustrates an approach to developing cumulative stream power estimates independent of time-series stream flow data, and using commonly-available geospatial and hydrologic data. This probabilistic method incorporates numerical watershed models and rainfall frequency estimates, coupled with a hydraulic model that translates flow rate into the depth and velocity. To illustrate, cumulative stream power was computed at a site (watershed area: 16 mi~2) according to two different methods: (1) utilizing available historical stream flow data, and (2) utilizing a watershed model coupled with probabilistic representations of rainfall depths. Findings show that in the shorter term (i.e., between 0-20 years), the difference between probabilistic (i.e., 'predicted') and gage-based (i.e., 'actual') cumulative stream power may differ considerably. However, when the probabilistic approach is applied over a sufficiently lengthy time period (i.e., beyond 20 years), the stream power computed by both methods can converge to less than 3% difference.
机译:可能需要评估历史流功率的绝大位置(例如,桥接站点)没有计算所需的流流量计数据。本文介绍并说明了发展累积流功率估计的方法,与时间序列流流量数据无关,并使用普通可用的地理空间和水文数据。该概率方法包括数值流域模型和降雨频率估计,与液压模型相结合,该液压模型将流速转化为深度和速度。为了说明,根据两种不同的方法在站点(流域区域:16mi〜2)上计算累积流功率:(1)利用可用的历史流流量数据,以及使用与降雨的概率表示的流域模型相结合深度。调查结果表明,在较短的术语(即0 - 20年之间),概率(即,'预测')和基于Gage(即,'实际')累积流功率之间的差异可能大大不同。然而,当在足够冗长的时间段(即,超过20年)上施加概率方法时,两种方法计算的流功率可以收敛到小于3%的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号