This paper explores the question of how agent designers perceive and treat their agent's opponents. In particular, it examines the influence of the opponent's identity (human vs. automated agent) in negotiations. We empirically demonstrate that when people interact spontaneously they treat human opponents differently than automated agents in the context of equity and fairness considerations. However, these difference vanish when people design and implement agents that will interact on their behalf. Nevertheless, the commitment of the agents to honor agreements with people is higher than their commitment to other agents. In the experiments, which comprised 147 computer science students, we used the Colored Trails game as the negotiation environment. We suggest possible explanations for the relationships among online players, agent designers, human opponents and automated opponents.
本文探讨了代理商设计者如何感知和对待代理商对手的问题。特别是,它检查了谈判中对手身份(人还是自动代理)的影响。我们的经验表明,在公平和公平考虑的情况下,人们自发地进行互动时,他们对待对手的方式与自动代理不同。但是,当人们设计和实现将代表他们进行交互的代理时,这些差异将消失。但是,代理商对与人达成协议的承诺要高于他们对其他代理商的承诺。在由147位计算机科学专业的学生组成的实验中,我们使用了Colored Trails游戏作为谈判环境。我们建议对在线玩家,代理设计师,人类对手和自动对手之间的关系提出可能的解释。 P>
机译:自动化代理可以与人充分协商吗?
机译:异构软件代理和人员的自动化团队合作基础架构
机译:使用合成和人类代理的自动视频游戏测试
机译:自动化代理如何在不公平的情况下对人类和其他自动化剂进行治疗:实验研究
机译:自动化组会议促进的会话代理人
机译:通过在自动化微粒酶免疫测定中用还原剂处理标本改进了对乙型肝炎核心抗原的抗体检测。
机译:检验人与自动代理人之间合作的信任与依赖