首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 12th International Rapeseed Congress: Sustainable Development in Cruciferous Oilseed Crops Production >Oilseed rape mechanical weed control as an alternative or a complement to chemical weed control
【24h】

Oilseed rape mechanical weed control as an alternative or a complement to chemical weed control

机译:油菜机械除草技术可替代或替代化学除草

获取原文

摘要

For agronomic, economic and environmental reasons, weed control in farming systems can no longer only rely on selective herbicides. In this context, mechanical weed control can be an alternative or a complement to herbicides. Trying to reduce the production costs and solving weeding problems that herbicides cannot solve are the two main reasons that lead farmers to adopt these techniques, but they also express fears about the high sensitivity to the climate and the work time these techniques require. Three tools have been tested in a network of 15 farmers' fields since 2003, alone or combined with herbicides: the in-row hoe, the finger weeder and the rotary hoe, in different types of soils and on different weeds. The selectivity has been assessed for each tool:the in-row hoe can be used from stage 3 leaves of the oilseed rape until the moment when the oilseed rape covers the inter-row;the finger weeder at pre-emergence stage and then from stage 3 leaves; the rotary hoe from pre-emergence to stage 4-5 leaves,including cotyledon stage. The efficacy of the finger weeder and the rotary hoe are very dependant on the development stage of the weeds: it strongly decreases when the weeds have more than 3 leaves. Efficacy rates of 80% and more have been reached in the trials in optimal conditions (weeds stage, soils, climate, etc...). Mechanical weed control is efficient against weeds that are hard to destroy with herbicides (crucifer weeds for example). One technique consists in spraying herbicides only on the row when sowing, and then using the in-row hoe to destroy weeds between the rows. The quantity of herbicides is thus reduced by 60% since only a part of the surface is treated. In-row hoeing without any herbicides is usually not efficient enough. Decision grids have been built to guide farmers in the use of these tools, according to the stage of the crop and the weeds, the soil humidity etc...An economic assessment has been made, that shows that mechanical weed control can be profitable thanks to the saving in herbicides costs, but the profitability of these techniques is very dependant on the number of hectares on which they are used.
机译:出于农业,经济和环境方面的原因,耕作系统中的杂草控制不再只能依靠选择性除草剂。在这种情况下,机械除草可以是除草剂的替代品或补充品。试图降低生产成本和解决除草剂无法解决的除草问题,这是导致农民采用这些技术的两个主要原因,但他们也担心这些技术需要高度的气候敏感性和工作时间。自2003年以来,已在15个农民田间的网络中对三种工具进行了单独或与除草剂结合使用的测试:行,手指除草剂和旋转,用于不同类型的土壤和不同的杂草上。已经评估了每种工具的选择性:可以从油菜的第3阶段叶子到油菜覆盖行间的那一刻使用行内头;在发芽前阶段然后从阶段开始使用手指除草器3片叶子;从出芽前到4-5阶段叶片的旋转头,包括子叶阶段。手指除草机和the头的功效在很大程度上取决于杂草的发育阶段:当杂草的叶子多于3片时,其功效会大大降低。在最佳条件下(杂草阶段,土壤,气候等),该试验的功效达到80%或更高。机械控制杂草对除草剂难以破坏的杂草(例如十字花科杂草)有效。一种技术是在播种时仅在行上喷洒除草剂,然后使用行内头消灭行之间的杂草。由于仅对部分表面进行了处理,因此除草剂的数量减少了60%。没有任何除草剂的行通常效率不高。建立了决策网格,根据农作物和杂草的生长阶段,土壤湿度等来指导农民使用这些工具。节省除草剂成本,但是这些技术的获利能力很大程度上取决于使用它们的公顷数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号