首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Fire and Materials >FIRE PATTERN PERSISTENCE AND PREDICTABILITY DURING FULL SCALE COMPARTMENT FIRE TESTS AND THE USE FOR COMPARISON OF POST FIRE ANALYSIS
【24h】

FIRE PATTERN PERSISTENCE AND PREDICTABILITY DURING FULL SCALE COMPARTMENT FIRE TESTS AND THE USE FOR COMPARISON OF POST FIRE ANALYSIS

机译:全尺度隔间消防试验期间的火灾模式持久性和可预测性以及用于后火灾分析的比较

获取原文

摘要

Fire Patterns, as defined by NFPA-921 are the visible or measurable physical effects that remain after a fire. Fire Pattern analysis has been a key factor in the determination of the origin and cause of fires for the past 50 years. During the International Conference on Fire Research for Fire Investigation, sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms in November 1997 a number of fire pattern research issues were identified. Those research items included; “Means to validate identification of electrical faults as an ignition source, Impact of flashover on fire patterns and other indicators, Effects of ventilation on fire growth and origin determination, and Validation of fire models” among others. In addition, the National Fire Protection Association’s Fire Protection Research Foundation in a White Paper “Recommendations of The Research Advisory Council on Post-fire Analysis2” issued February 2002, also identified a number of fire pattern research needs. The White Paper in Section III Recommendations, Origin and Cause Investigation Methods made the following recommendations: “Since knowledge of the origin of a fire is, in nearly all cases, essential to determining cause, a high priority should be placed on new or improved methods for identifying the point or area of origin including burn pattern analysis”. And, “Methods for analyzing burn patterns concerning their meaning in the early growth history of the fire are also important. In particular, how does one determine when in the course of the fire event a particular pattern was made and how it might relate to a given potential ignition scenario”? Many years prior to these two initiatives, the Advanced Fire Patterns Project (1985) had been formed as a partnership between the National Association of Fire Investigators (NAFI) and the Fire and Safety Engineering Technology Program, Eastern Kentucky University to complete research into the development of fire patterns on exposed surfaces and transfer that information to those that attended seminars and other educational programs sponsored by the two entities. The purpose of this paper is to describe the results of the full scale test burns that were conducted at Eastern Kentucky University and sponsored by the Advanced Fire Pattern Project. A series of ten full scale tests over a three year span were conducted in identically constructed, finished and furnished compartments. In each of the tests with one exception all fires progressed to full room involvement. Additionally, a full scale test was completed on a specially constructed and furnished room to assist in studying fire growth and spread and the resulting pattern formation in comparison to the fire patterns that were witnessed in a compartment of an actual compartment fire in which there had been a fatality. These full scale test burns provided a considerable amount of data concerning fire pattern development and evolution during fire growth and spread. Specifically, these test burns demonstrated fire pattern persistence and predictability during pre and post full room involvement fires. The full scale tests demonstrated that the fire patterns described in current literature are correct and when used properly can assist in the determination of the origin of a fire. The last and one of the most significant items was that if properly conducted, a post fire testing utilizing full scale burns and computer fire modeling may assist in the understanding of fire pattern development and fire growth.
机译:由NFPA-921定义的火模式是火灾后留下的可见或可测量的物理效果。火模式分析是在过去50年来确定火灾的起源和原因的关键因素。在1997年11月,烟草和枪支联邦酒精联邦局赞助的消防调查国际会议期间,确定了许多火灾模式研究问题。这些研究项目包括在内; “意味着验证电气故障的识别作为点火源,闪光灯对消防模式的影响和其他指标,通风对火灾生长的影响,以及消防模型的验证等。此外,国防保护协会的消防研究基金会在白皮书中“推荐研究咨询委员会关于火灾后分析2”发布于2002年2月发布,还确定了许多火灾模式的研究需求。第三节中的白皮书建议,起源和原因调查方法提出了以下建议:“由于对火灾起源的知识是在几乎所有情况下,对于确定原因至关重要,应在新的或改进的方法上放置高优先级用于识别出原产地的点或区域,包括烧伤模式分析“。而且,“分析燃烧模式的方法在火灾早期增长史上的含义也很重要。特别是,如何确定在火灾过程中何时进行特定模式以及如何与给定的潜在点火场景有关“?在这两项举措之前多年来,先进的消防模式项目(1985年)已在全国火灾调查人员(NAFI)和火灾和安全工程技术方案,东肯塔基大学东部大学的伙伴关系中形成了伙伴关系,以完成发展暴露表面上的火模式并将信息转移到那些参加由两个实体赞助的研讨会和其他教育方案的信息。本文的目的是描述在东肯塔基大学进行的全规模测试燃烧的结果,并由高级火灾模式项目赞助。在相同的构造,成品和带家具的隔间,在三年内进行了一系列十大全规模测试。在每个测试中,所有火灾都进入全房间参与。此外,在专门建造和带家具的房间内完成了全规模测试,以协助研究火灾生长和传播,并与现有的实际隔间火灾隔间中目睹的火模式相比死亡。这些全规模测试烧伤提供了大量关于火灾成长和传播期间的火模式开发和演变的数据。具体而言,这些测试烧伤在预先和发布的全室中的参与火灾中显示出火模式持久性和可预测性。全尺度测试证明,当前文献中描述的火模式是正确的,并且当使用时,可以帮助确定火灾的起源。最后一个和最重要的项目之一是,如果正确进行,利用满量程烧伤和计算机火模型的火灾测试可能有助于了解火灾模式开发和火灾增长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号