首页> 外文会议>PTC's annual conference;PTC'07 >ECONOMIC ISSUES OF LOCAL REGULATORY FORBEARANCE
【24h】

ECONOMIC ISSUES OF LOCAL REGULATORY FORBEARANCE

机译:地方监管宽容的经济问题

获取原文

摘要

We are now starting to see true-facilities-based competition for wired voice and video services for the first time in many markets as the telephone and cable operators offer directly competing services. However, in the absence of regulation, services to residences and small businesses are still likely to be priced at other than truly competitive levels. This is due to the fact that prices in duopoly, or even oligopoly, markets are generally not the same as one would expect to see in markets with significantly larger numbers of service providers. The question is one of degree, specifically whether the results under duopoly are likely to be equal to or better, in both the short- and long-run, than those under regulated monopoly to warrant regulatory forbearance. One of greatest problems with the emerging duopoly markets is the potential of cream skimming. This leads to the quandary of how one balances the overall savings to consumers, on one hand, with the possible distributional issues, on the other. One aspect of the creamskimming question is whether the duopoly firms will focus on the higher-value consumers, leaving consumers who want basic service with little choice and, possibly, increased prices. This paper provides a context for the analysis of this problem and explores possible solutions.
机译:随着电话和电缆运营商提供直接竞争的服务,我们现在开始在许多市场中首次看到基于真设施的有线语音和视频服务的竞争。但是,在缺乏监管的情况下,向住宅和小型企业提供的服务的定价仍可能会超出真正的竞争水平。这是由于这样一个事实,即双寡头甚至寡头垄断市场的价格通常与服务提供商数量明显增加的市场所期望的价格不同。问题是程度之一,特别是在短期和长期而言,双寡头垄断下的结果是否可能等于或优于受监管的垄断下的结果,以保证监管的容忍度。新兴的双头垄断市场面临的最大问题之一是脱脂奶油的潜力。这就导致了这样一种困惑:一方面,如何平衡对消费者的总体节省;另一方面,如何平衡可能的分配问题。撇脂问题的一个方面是,双头垄断公司是否将重点放在高价值的消费者身上,而那些希望获得基本服务的消费者则别无选择,甚至有可能提高价格。本文为分析该问题提供了背景,并探讨了可能的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号