首页> 外文会议>AWMA symposium on air quality measurement methods and technology >A Comparison of EPA Methods 8260B and TO-14A/15 forthe analysis of VOCs in Soil Gas: Application to UpwardVapor Intrusion Risk Studies
【24h】

A Comparison of EPA Methods 8260B and TO-14A/15 forthe analysis of VOCs in Soil Gas: Application to UpwardVapor Intrusion Risk Studies

机译:EPA方法8260B和TO-14A / 15用于分析土壤气体中VOC的比较:在UpwardVapor入侵风险研究中的应用

获取原文

摘要

The determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in soil vapor (gas) isnecessary in order to obtain empirical data to enter into risk models for upward vaporintrusion. Several EPA Methods are currently being used to furnish the regulatorycommunity with this information. Two of the most commonly used are EPA Method8260B (from SW-846) and the two similar ambient air methods EPA TO-14A and TO-15. None of the methods were originally designed to apply to soil vapor and as such allare being modified by analytical chemists and laboratories in order to make themamenable to the soil vapor matrix.A comparison of the methods will be presented that shows the similarities and thedifferences between the two procedures. The protocols for sampling of soil vapor, theanalytical instrumentation used, standardization and calibration procedures, range anddetection limits will be contrasted along with those modifications necessary to apply thewritten methods to soil gas. The advantages of each of the three methods along with theassumptions and weaknesses inherent in each method will be presented with the objectiveof utilizing all three in a complementary fashion. Finally, parallel analysis of soil vaporsamples by EPA 8260B and TO-15 performed in the author' s laboratories will bepresented to support the theoretical conclusions.
机译:测定土壤蒸气(气体)中的挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的方法是 为了获得经验数据以进入上升蒸气的风险模型所必需 入侵。目前正在使用几种EPA方法来提供法规 此信息的社区。两种最常用的方法是EPA方法 8260B(来自SW-846)和两种类似的环境空气方法EPA TO-14A和TO- 15.这些方法最初都不是设计用于土壤蒸气的,因此所有方法 正在由分析化学家和实验室进行修改,以使它们 适合土壤蒸汽基质。 将对这些方法进行比较,以显示相似性和 两种程序之间的差异。采样土壤蒸气的协议, 使用的分析仪器,标准化和校准程序,范围和 检出限将与应用检出限所需的那些修改进行对比。 书面方法去土壤瓦斯。三种方法各自的优点以及 每种方法固有的假设和弱点将与目标一起呈现 以互补的方式利用这三个方面。最后,对土壤蒸气进行平行分析 在作者的实验室中执行的EPA 8260B和TO-15样品 提出来支持理论结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号