【24h】

(When) Can Europe Match US’ Military Power?

机译:(何时)欧洲可以匹配美国的军事力量吗?

获取原文

摘要

The Atlantic defence technology gap is substantial and appears to be growing in spiteof an apparent political desire to close it. This paper estimates that the US stock ofusable military equipment for modern warfare is about five to ten times larger thanEurope’s. The US military industrial machine is comparably highly efficient; Keyindicators show progressive larger gaps compared to Europe the closer one gets tothe battlefield. US defence budgets are only about 60 % higher than that of theEuropean nations. The US lead on military investment is about 120 %, its militaryR&D beats Europe by 240 % resulting in a battlefield “advantage” of more than480%. A System Dynamics simulation model is built to explore policies for closingthis battlefield technology gap. In a base case scenario, this Atlantic divide continuesto grow. Three policy tests are then run: First EU defence budgets are increased toUS levels; then EU transforms its forces to expeditionary non-conscription units; lastEuropean military industry is consolidated combined with a tripling of R&D efforts.Neither policy is successful alone, yet with all three policies combined, the gap issignificantly reduced and in about twenty-five years almost closed. The likelihood ofsuch a combined aggressive European defence policy is discussed. It is argued thatsince the EU favours a softer security strategy, it will not want to bear the combinedpolicy’s high economic and political cost. Consequently, the EU will (have to) becontent filling the western world’s soft power niche.
机译:大西洋防务技术差距巨大,并且尽管在不断扩大 显然有政治意愿关闭它。本文估计,美国的库存量为 用于现代战争的可用军事装备比大约大五到十倍 欧洲的。美国军用工业机器的效率相对较高。钥匙 指标显示,与欧洲相比,差距越来越大,差距越来越大 战场。美国国防预算仅比美国国防预算高60%。 欧洲国家。美国在军事投资方面的领先优势约为120%, 研发击败欧洲240%,导致战场上的“优势”超过了 480%。建立了系统动力学仿真模型来探索关闭策略 这个战场技术差距。在基本情况下,这种大西洋鸿沟仍在继续 成长。然后进行三项政策测试:首先,欧盟国防预算增加到 美国水平;然后,欧盟将其部队转变为远征非征兵部队;最后的 欧洲军事工业得到巩固,并进行了三倍的研发努力。 哪一项政策都不能成功,但将这三项政策结合起来,差距是 显着减少,并在约25年内几乎关闭。的可能性 讨论了这种综合的侵略性欧洲防卫政策。有人认为 由于欧盟赞成采用更软的安全策略,因此它不想承担合并的 政策的高昂经济和政治成本。因此,欧盟将(必须)成为 内容填补了西方世界的软实力利基。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号