首页> 外文会议>Waste management symposium >CONSENT VERSUS CONSENSUS Stakeholder Involvement in the Identification of Necessary and Sufficient Transportation Safety Requirements
【24h】

CONSENT VERSUS CONSENSUS Stakeholder Involvement in the Identification of Necessary and Sufficient Transportation Safety Requirements

机译:同意与共识利益相关者参与识别必要和充分的运输安全要求

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Radioactive materials transportation is stringently regulated by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to provide for the protection of the public and the environment; historically these regulations have proven quite sufficient. Even so, when the Department of Energy (DOE) makes radioactive materials shipments, that are deemed to be a major federal activity, regulations under the National Environmental Policy Act require that public input on safety issues be sought. This requirement leads to interactions with State, Tribal and local stakeholders that often result in the imposition of extra-regulatory requirements - requirements beyond those prescribed by DOT and NRC regulations. Unfortunately, these additional requirements virtually always increase costs and delay schedules, and usually do so without significantly increasing, and possibly even decreasing overall transportation safety. We believe that this problem arises because of efforts to achieve stakeholder consensus rather than stakeholder consent, where "consensus" connotes universal agreement with all aspects of the program, while "consent", as used here, is simple agreement with the overall course of action. Gaining consensus entails extensive negotiations because each stakeholder must agree to all aspects and requirements of the project. Gaining consent, on the other hand, requires only that stakeholders be satisfied that the project, as planned, provides adequately for their safety needs. This article addresses the issue of consent versus consensus and proposes a systematic, decision science process for reaching consent. Key steps in this proposed process are early identification and involvement of stakeholders, compilation of their concerns, perceptions, needs, causes, and translation of that information into an appropriate set of "derived requirements." These derived requirements, along with already-established DOT and NRC regulatory requirements, form the necessary and sufficient conditions for safe transportation and for obtaining stakeholder consent.
机译:放射性物质运输由美国运输部(DOT)和核监管委员会(NRC)严格调节,以提供公众和环境的保护;历史上,这些法规已经证明了很多。即便如此,当能源部(DOE)制造放射性物质的出货量时,被认为是主要的联邦活动,国家环境政策法下的法规要求寻求关于安全问题的公共投入。这一要求导致与国家,部落和地方利益相关者的互动,这些人经常导致征收额外的监管要求 - 超出DOT和NRC法规规定的要求。不幸的是,这些额外要求几乎总是始终增加成本和延迟时间表,并且通常在没有显着增加的情况下进行,并且可能甚至降低整体运输安全性。我们相信这一问题是由于努力实现利益攸关方的共识而不是利益攸关方同意,在此处“共识”与该计划的各个方面的普遍协定,同时在这里使用的“同意”是简单的与整体行动方案的简单协议。获得共识需要广泛的谈判,因为每个利益攸关方必须同意项目的所有方面和要求。另一方面,同意同意只需要利益攸关方对计划,按计划提供充分的安全需求。本文涉及同意与共识的问题,并提出了一种达成同意的系统,决策科学进程。该拟议进程中的关键步骤是利益相关者的早期识别和参与利益攸关方,汇编其关注,看法,需求,原因和将该信息的翻译成适当的“衍生要求”。这些衍生的要求以及已经建立的DOT和NRC监管要求,为安全运输提供必要和充分的条件,并获得利益攸关方同意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号