首页> 外文会议>Waste management symposium >WASTE CLEANUP: STATUS AND IMPLICATIONS OF COMPLIANCE AGREEMENTS BETWEEN DOE AND ITS REGULATORS 1
【24h】

WASTE CLEANUP: STATUS AND IMPLICATIONS OF COMPLIANCE AGREEMENTS BETWEEN DOE AND ITS REGULATORS 1

机译:废物清洁:能源部及其监管者之间遵守协定的现状和意义1

获取原文

摘要

This paper discusses compliance agreements that affect the Department of Energy's (DOE)cleanup program. Compliance agreements are legally enforceable documents between DOE andits regulators, specifying cleanup activities and milestones that DOE has agreed to achieve.2Over the years, these compliance agreements have been used to implement much of the cleanupactivity at DOE sites, which is carried out primarily under two federal laws—the ComprehensiveEnvironmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA) andthe Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended (RCRA). Besides DOE,other parties to the agreements include various federal and state agencies that have jurisdictionover environmental and health issues. Our objectives were to determine the types of complianceagreements in effect at DOE cleanup sites, DOE's progress in achieving the milestones containedin the agreements, whether the agreements allowed DOE to prioritize work across sites accordingto relative risk, and possible implications the agreements have on DOE's efforts to improve thecleanup program.In summary,? The 70 compliance agreements at DOE sites can be divided into three main types: (1)agreements specifically required by CERCLA or by RCRA, (2) court-ordered agreementsresulting from lawsuits initiated primarily by states, and (3) other agreements, includingstate administrative orders enforcing state hazardous waste management laws.? DOE reported completing about 80 percent of the 7,186 milestones by the time originallyscheduled in the agreements. When DOE found itself unable to complete a milestone ontime, regulators have generally been willing to negotiate extensions, approving about 93percent of DOE's requests for milestone changes. In only a few instances have regulatorsapplied penalties for missed milestones.? Compliance agreements are site-specific and are not intended to provide a mechanism forDOE to use in prioritizing risks among the various sites. However, DOE's February 2002initiative to improve the Environmental Management program has as a central componentdeveloping risk-reduction priorities and concentrating its efforts on activities thatcontribute to risk reduction.
机译:本文讨论了影响能源部(DOE)的合规性协议 清理程序。合规协议是DOE与 它的监管者,指定DOE同意实现的清理活动和里程碑。2 多年来,这些合规协议已用于实施大部分清理工作 在DOE站点进行的活动,主要是根据两项联邦法律进行的-综合 经修订的1980年《环境响应,赔偿与责任法》(CERCLA)和 经修订的1976年资源保护和恢复法(RCRA)。除了能源部 协议的其他各方包括具有管辖权的各种联邦和州机构 讨论环境和健康问题。我们的目标是确定合规类型 能源部清理现场有效的协议,能源部在实现所包含的里程碑方面的进展 在协议中,协议是否允许DOE根据 相对风险,以及该协议对美国能源部(DOE)改善服务质量的努力可能产生的影响 清理程序。 总之, ? DOE站点的70个合规协议可以分为三种主要类型:(1) CERCLA或RCRA特别要求的协议,(2)法院命令的协议 主要是由州提起的诉讼引起的;以及(3)其他协议,包括 国家行政命令执行国家危险废物管理法律。 ?美国能源部报告说,到最初的时间,已完成了7,186个里程碑中的80% 安排在协议中。当美国能源部发现自己无法完成里程碑时 到时候,监管机构通常愿意就延期问题进行谈判,批准了约93 能源部要求更改里程碑的百分比。仅在少数情况下具有调节器 对未完成的里程碑处以罚款。 ?合规协议是针对特定站点的,并非旨在提供一种机制来 DOE用于在各个站点之间确定风险的优先级。但是,美国能源部2002年2月 改善环境管理计划的倡议已成为核心要素 制定降低风险的优先事项并将精力集中在 有助于降低风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号