The need for research in this area is indicated by the serious shortfalls in our understanding of how best to design software for value creation. There are at least two basic dimensions to this shortfall. First, the core competency of software engineers is making technical software product and process design decisions. However, today there is a disconnect between the technical criteria taught to software engineers and the strategic value creation objectives of the organizations for which software is designed.
This disconnect is reflected in the culture and the literature of software design. For example, of sixteen books on software architecture and object-oriented design surveyed, the word
Today this lack of understanding is intolerable. Software design and use decisions are coupled with fundamental business, public service, and other decisions in almost field. It is becoming critical to develop a better understanding of how software design decisions relate to value creation.
The second dimension of the problem is that existing knowledge in software economics is inadequate. To simplify, most present knowledge focuses on cost and risk reduction in traditional government or large industry projects; but today organizations are often driven more by competition and time-to-market as by direct cost. New life-cycle models and software technologies are also being used that tend to invalidate the empirical bases of older models.
The EDSER workshops seek to raise the visibility of the economic dimension of software design and use and to foster the emergence and evaluation of economics-oriented concepts, models and tools to improve software production. The EDSER-2 Workshop was made possible in part by the National Science Foundation under grant CCR-9804078.
在我们对如何最好地设计用于创造价值的软件的理解上存在严重不足,这表明了对这一领域研究的需求。此缺陷至少有两个基本方面。首先,软件工程师的核心能力是制定技术软件产品和流程设计决策。但是,如今,向软件工程师传授的技术标准与为其设计软件的组织的战略价值创造目标之间存在脱节。 P>
这种脱节反映在软件设计的文化和文献中。例如,在接受调查的16本有关软件体系结构和面向对象设计的书中, 问题的第二个方面是软件经济学中的现有知识不足。为简化起见,目前的大多数知识都集中在传统政府或大型工业项目中的成本和风险降低上。但是如今,组织通常更多地受到竞争和上市时间以及直接成本的驱动。还使用了新的生命周期模型和软件技术,这些模型和软件技术往往会使旧模型的经验基础无效。 P>
EDSER研讨会旨在提高软件设计和使用的经济维度的可视性,并促进出现和评估面向经济学的概念,模型和工具,以改善软件的生产。 EDSER-2研讨会的一部分是由美国国家科学基金会在CCR-9804078资助下进行的。 P>
机译:Web2SE 2011的研讨会报告:第二届软件工程Web 2.0国际研讨会
机译:第二届机器人软件工程国际研讨会报告(RoSE'19)
机译:第二届国际经验软件工程研究复制研讨会的报告(RESER 2011)
机译:第五届经济学驱动的软件工程研究国际研讨会(EDSER-5)“在工程决策中寻求价值”
机译:激励高中生和老师创建交互式软件:夏季研讨会是否会影响参与者开发游戏和动画的兴趣?
机译:简介:从第二届语义驱动的数据分析国际研讨会(SEPDA 2017)中精选的扩展文章
机译:第19届需求工程国际工作会议:软件质量基础(REFsQ 2013)。 2013年REFsQ研讨会CreaRE,IWspm和RepriCo,REFsQ 2013经验轨道(实证实验和实证研究会),REFsQ 2013博士研讨会和REFsQ 2013海报会议的会议记录
机译:软件工程中极限编程和敏捷过程国际会议(第7次)。 2006年6月17日至22日在芬兰奥卢举行。教程,研讨会,活动和主题演讲