首页> 外文会议>SUR/FIN-1996 international technical conference >Comparison Study of Potassium Hydroxide (Caustic Potash) Alkaline Non Cyanide Zinc VS Sodium Hydroxide (Caustic Soda) Alkaline Non Cyanide Zinc
【24h】

Comparison Study of Potassium Hydroxide (Caustic Potash) Alkaline Non Cyanide Zinc VS Sodium Hydroxide (Caustic Soda) Alkaline Non Cyanide Zinc

机译:氢氧化钾(苛性钾)碱性非氰锌与VS氢氧化钠(苛性钠)碱性非氰锌的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Haring cell and Hull cell studies were carried out to evaluate zinc deposit plating efficiencies and throwing power, appearance etc. of alkaline non cyanide zinc baths using Sodium Hydroxide and Potassium Hydroxide electrolytes. Study showed that even at low zinc metal concentration ( 1.0 oz/gal) under certain conditions up to 95percent plating efficiencies can be achieved from both the alkaline non cyanide zinc baths. Plating efficiency decreases as current density increases with both the plating baths however, Potassium Hydroxide bath gave higher plating efficiencies than Sodium Hydroxide bath at higher current densities applied in this test series. Carbonates were not freezing out from Potassium Hydroxide bath. Presence of carbonate reduced plating efficiency in both the plating baths although Potassium Hydroxide bath gave higher plating efficiency than Sodium Hydroxide bath. Zinc plate distribution or throwing power was inferior with Potassium Hydroxide bath at lowest current density utilized in this test although it was equal to Sodium Hydroxide bath at other two higher current densities applied in this test series. Distribution or throwing power and efficiency remained just about unchanged with hard water. Effect of hard water on appearance was inconclusive at this time. In general higher current density appearance was better with Potassium Hydroxide bath than Sodium Hydroxide bath. Potassium Hydroxide bath costs higher than Sodium Hydroxide bath.
机译:进行了Haring电池和Hull电池研究,以评估使用氢氧化钠和氢氧化钾电解质的碱性非氰化锌镀液的锌沉积镀覆效率以及抛镀力,外观等。研究表明,即使在某些条件下以较低的锌金属浓度(1.0 oz / gal)进行电镀,两种碱性无氰锌镀液均可达到高达95%的镀覆效率。在两个电镀液中,电镀效率都随着电流密度的增加而降低,但是,在该测试系列中,在更高的电流密度下,氢氧化钾电镀液比氢氧化钠电镀液具有更高的电镀效率。碳酸盐未从氢氧化钾浴中冻结出来。尽管氢氧化钾浴比氢氧化钠浴具有更高的电镀效率,但是碳酸盐的存在降低了两个电镀浴的电镀效率。尽管在该测试系列中使用的其他两种较高电流密度下的氢氧化钾镀液与氢氧化钠镀液相同,但在最低电流密度下,氢氧化钾镀液的锌板分布或投掷能力较氢氧化钾镀液差。用硬水分配或投掷的功率和效率几乎保持不变。此时硬水对外观的影响尚无定论。通常,氢氧化钾浴比氢氧化钠浴具有更高的电流密度外观。氢氧化钾浴的成本高于氢氧化钠浴。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号