【24h】

To link or not to link

机译:链接或不链接

获取原文

摘要

Little is known about Hypertext writing style. This study examines the effects of link quantity and quality on usability. Our chosen domain is technical documentation which has a very regular writing style and organization. We compare two Hypertext Networks: one network has intuitively created links and the other is an algorithmic enhancement of it. The enhanced network has the same number of destination links, but more total link-anchors.

Twelve subjects (six for each system) were asked to answer a set of eleven questions by navigating through the networks. We were interested in investigating three issues: efficiency (how many nodes need to be visited), speed (how much time is required) and accuracy (what is the error rate).

Results showed that the lightly linked network required users to visit significantly more nodes to answer a question than the heavily linked equivalent. Heavy linking enabled users to find the answers to questions more quickly, but not significantly so. There was little difference in the error rate.

机译:

对超文本写作风格知之甚少。这项研究检查了链接数量和质量对可用性的影响。我们选择的领域是技术文档,该文档的写作风格和组织结构非常规范。我们比较了两个超文本网络:一个网络直观地创建了链接,另一个网络是其算法的增强。增强型网络具有相同数量的目标链接,但具有更多的总链接锚。

十二名受试者(每个系统六个)被要求通过网络导航回答一组十一个问题。我们对研究三个问题感兴趣:效率(需要访问多少个节点),速度(需要多少时间)和准确性(错误率是什么)。

结果显示,与高度链接的等效网络相比,轻链接的网络要求用户访问更多节点以回答问题。紧密的链接使用户可以更快地找到问题的答案,但并不是很明显。错误率差异不大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利