首页> 外文会议>Symposium on field instrumentation for soil and rock >Compaction Comparison Testing Using a Modified Impact Soil Tester And Nuclear Density Gauge
【24h】

Compaction Comparison Testing Using a Modified Impact Soil Tester And Nuclear Density Gauge

机译:使用改进的冲击土壤测试仪和核密度计进行压实比较测试

获取原文

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to compare test results of a modified Impact Soil Tester (IST) on compacted soil with data obtained from the same soil using a nuclear density gauge at the U.S. Army Corp of Engineer's Buena Vista Flood Wall project in Buena Vista, Virginia. The tests were run during construction of the earth flood wall during the summer of 1996. This comparison testing demonstrated the credibility of the procedure developed for the IST as a compaction testing device. The comparison data was obtained on a variety of soils ranging from silty sands to clays. The Flood Wall comparison compaction data for 90percent Standard Proctor shows that the results of the IST as modified are consistent with the nuclear density gauge 89 percent of the time for all types of soil tested. However, if the soils are more cohesive then the results are consistent with the nuclear density gauge 97 percent of the time. In addition these comparison tests are in general agreement with comparison compaction testing using the same testing techniques and methods on compacted backfill in utility trenches conducted earlier for the Public Works Department, Chesterfield County, Virginia.
机译:本文的目的是比较美国陆军工程兵部Buena Vista防洪墙项目中采用核密度仪从密实土壤中获得的改良型冲击土壤测试仪(IST)的测试结果,以及从相同土壤中获得的数据,弗吉尼亚州。该测试在1996年夏季的防洪墙建造过程中进行。此对比测试证明了IST作为压实测试设备而开发的程序的可信度。比较数据是在从粉砂到粘土的各种土壤上获得的。对于90%的标准Proctor洪水墙比较压实数据表明,对于所有类型的土壤,修改后的IST的结果与核密度仪在89%的时间内均保持一致。但是,如果土壤具有更高的粘性,那么结果在97%的时间内与核密度仪是一致的。此外,这些比较试验与使用较早的压实回填进行比较的压实试验是一致的,该压实试验是在弗吉尼亚州切斯特菲尔德县的公共工程部门进行的,对公用工程沟槽中的压实回填进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号