首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Power and Embedded Drive Control >A Novel Comparison of Gauss-Seidel and Newton-Raphson Methods for Load Flow Analysis
【24h】

A Novel Comparison of Gauss-Seidel and Newton-Raphson Methods for Load Flow Analysis

机译:高斯-Seidel和牛顿 - 拉申方法对负载流量分析的新颖比较

获取原文

摘要

All over the world, several methods of power flow analysis are used, namely Gauss-Seidel, Newton Raphson, Fast Decoupled Load Flow methods because power flow analysis is a critical factor for proper planning of power generating scheduling economically and calculation of power loss, bus voltage, angle. In this work, an operational comparison between Gauss-Seidel and Newton Raphson method is depicted using MATLAB simulation software for a 4-Bus system. By following the obtained values, it is prominent that Gauss Seidel follows the linear convergence whereas Newton Raphson exhibits the quadratic convergence. The selection of slack bus affects the Gauss-Seidel convergence adversely but for Newton-Raphson has minimal sensitivity towards this selection. While going through the simulation, it is lucid that Gauss-Seidel is comprehensible and reliable for small systems which are antithesis for Newton Raphson Method because repetitive computation of Jacobian makes it complicated.
机译:在全球范围内,使用了几种功率流分析方法,即高斯-Seidel,牛顿Raphson,快速解耦的负载流程方法,因为功率流量分析是适当规划发电调度的主要规划和计算功率损失,总线的关键因素。电压,角度。在这项工作中,使用MATLAB仿真软件为4总线系统描述了Gauss-Seidel和Newton Raphson方法的操作比较。通过遵循所获得的值,突出的是高斯Seidel遵循线性融合,而牛顿拉文赛表现出二次收敛。 Slack总线的选择对高斯 - Seidel收敛不利影响,但对于牛顿-Raphson对这种选择具有最小的灵敏度。在进行模拟时,对于牛顿Raphson方法的对抗的小系统来说,高斯-Seidel是清晰的,因为jacobian的重复计算使其变得复杂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号