首页> 外文会议> >An experimental comparison between several pneumatic position control methods
【24h】

An experimental comparison between several pneumatic position control methods

机译:几种气动位置控制方法的实验比较

获取原文

摘要

In this paper an experimental comparison is made between six different techniques to control the position of a pneumatic actuator. Six different reference signals have been tested on each control technique. The methods considered are: (A) PID, (B) fuzzy, (C) PID with pressure feedback, (D) fuzzy with pressure feedback, (E) sliding mode and (F) neuro-fuzzy control. In the last method, proposed by the authors, the differential pressure sensor has been replaced by a neural network based estimator. Details of each control method and the results obtained are given and finally a global comparison is made with several critical considerations.
机译:在本文中,对六种不同的控制气动执行机构位置的技术进行了实验比较。在每种控制技术上已经测试了六个不同的参考信号。所考虑的方法是:(A)PID,(B)模糊,(C)具有压力反馈的PID,(D)具有压力反馈的模糊,(E)滑动模式和(F)神经模糊控制。在作者提出的最后一种方法中,压差传感器已被基于神经网络的估计器所取代。给出了每种控制方法的详细信息和获得的结果,最后进行了一些关键考虑的全局比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号