首页> 外文会议> >Cross-national and Cross-industrial Comparison of Two Strategy Approaches for Global Industrial Evolution
【24h】

Cross-national and Cross-industrial Comparison of Two Strategy Approaches for Global Industrial Evolution

机译:两种全球产业演进战略方法的跨国和跨行业比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This research focuses on analyzing the two prime science and technology (Son6;T) strategy approaches for industrial evolution based on the concept of Son6;T gap, namely, the optimist and pragmatist approaches. Particularly, the cases of global IC, pharmaceutical, and computer industries, are used to make cross-national and cross-industrial comparison of these two approaches. The optimist approach is developed based on the product life cycle theory which envisions technology transcending everyday limitations. With this perspective, market demand is the most critical factor in selecting the Son6;T strategy approaches. The pragmatist approach is formed based on the new trade theory which recognizes the power of science and technology but seeks to fit it into structures that already exist, and government must manage resources pouring into science and technology. Case studies of global IC, pharmaceutical, and computer industries during the 2nd half of the 20th century are used as research targets to reflect policy impacts on the technological evolution. The results of this study reveal that, strategy approaches have to be adapted and turned to the specific stage, technology level, and market segment that have been selected for intervention. This result of comparison also offers the criteria of strategy approach selection for developing different industry based on distinct national base.
机译:本研究着重分析基于Son6; T差距概念的两种主要的科学技术(Son6; T)战略以促进产业发展,即乐观主义和实用主义。特别是,以全球IC,制药和计算机行业为例,对这两种方法进行跨国和跨行业比较。乐观主义者的方法是基于产品生命周期理论开发的,该理论设想了超越日常限制的技术。从这个角度来看,市场需求是选择Son6; T战略方法的最关键因素。实用主义的方法是基于新的贸易理论形成的,该理论认识到科学技术的力量,但力求使其适应已经存在的结构,政府必须管理涌入科学技术的资源。 20世纪后半叶全球IC,制药和计算机行业的案例研究被用作研究目标,以反映政策对技术发展的影响。这项研究的结果表明,必须对战略方法进行调整,并将其转向已选择进行干预的特定阶段,技术水平和市场领域。比较的结果也为根据不同国家的基础发展不同行业提供了战略方法选择的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号