首页> 外文会议> >TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF STANDARD DEVIATION OF LANE POSITIONAS ASSESSED ON A PC-BASED DRIVING SIMULATOR
【24h】

TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF STANDARD DEVIATION OF LANE POSITIONAS ASSESSED ON A PC-BASED DRIVING SIMULATOR

机译:在基于PC的驾驶模拟器上评估车道位置的标准偏差的测试-可靠性

获取原文

摘要

Driving is an everyday activity that is commonly affected by neurologic disorders and medicaltreatments. A frequently used metric for assessing driving ability is the standard deviation of laneposition (SDLP), or the amount that subjects "swerve" within their driving lane. Thismeasurement has been used with individuals under the influence of alcohol, illicit drugs, andprescribed medications in both on-road and simulator studies. Although good test-retestreliability is critical if one is to measure change in individuals over time, there is surprisinglylimited data regarding the test-retest reliability of SDLP.Objective. To examine the test-retest reliability of SDLP in subjects tested at (1) a 3-month retestinterval (a time frame common to clinical trials), and (2) a year or longer retest interval (a timeperiod over which one might track changes in neurologic patients.Methods. Group 1 completed retesting an average of 84 (s.d. = 8.1) days after their initialsimulator assessment. Both HIV negative (HIV-; n = 16) and positive (HIV+; n = 13) subjectswere included to explore short-term reliability in control and mildly ill patient groups. All HIV+subjects were medically asymptomatic, and unlikely to experience HIV-related changes over thisinterval. Two HIV+ subjects were neuropsychologically (NP) impaired.Group 2 (n = 31), a different cohort, was retested an average of 19.8 (8.3) months after baseline.All subjects completed NP evaluations at baseline and follow-up, with NP status rated on a scaleof 1 (above average) to 9 (severe impairment) by a clinician blinded to simulator performance.Twelve subjects (39%) were NP impaired. In order to examine reliability in a stable neurologiccohort, all subjects were selected because they remained at the same level of NP functioning atfollow-up.SDLP was assessed in both groups using an interactive PC-based driving simulator that consistedof a monitor, steering wheel, and brake/accelerator pedals. Participants were required to maintainlane position while holding a constant speed (55 mph) and responding to divided attention tasksin the corner of the monitor. Group 2 completed an existing, standardized scenario (TOPS),while Group 1 completed a newly developed driving scenario. Both simulations lastedapproximately 7 minutes.Results. Combined reliability for Group 1 was .74. Test-retest reliability was .68 for the HIV-and .83 for the HIV+ subjects. For Group 2, SDLP was significantly correlated with NPfunctioning at baseline (r = .5, p = .005) and follow-up (r = .48, p = .006), with impaired subjects
机译:驾驶是一种日常活动,通常会受到神经系统疾病和医学的影响 治疗。评估驾驶能力的常用指标是车道的标准偏差 位置(SDLP)或在其行驶车道内使“减速”的数量。这 酒精,非法药物和 公路和模拟器研究中的处方药。虽然很好的重测 如果要衡量个人随时间的变化,则可靠性至关重要。 有关SDLP重测可靠性的有限数据。 客观的。为了检查在(1)测试的受试者中SDLP的重测信度,为期3个月的重测 间隔(临床试验通用的时间范围),以及(2)一年或更长时间的重测间隔(时间 一段时期内,可以追踪神经系统疾病患者的变化。 方法。第1组在初次测试后平均完成84(s.d. = 8.1)天的重新测试 模拟器评估。 HIV阴性(HIV-; n = 16)和阳性(HIV +; n = 13)受试者 研究旨在探讨对照组和轻症患者组的短期可靠性。所有艾滋病毒+ 受试者在医学上无症状,因此在此期间不太可能发生与艾滋病相关的变化 间隔。两名HIV +受试者神经心理学(NP)受损。 在基线后平均19.8(8.3)个月对第二组(n = 31),一个不同的队列进行了重新测试。 所有受试者在基线和随访时均完成了NP评估,并且对NP状态进行了评分 对模拟器性能视而不见的临床医生中,有1例(高于平均水平)到9例(严重损伤)。 十二名受试者(39%)NP受损。为了检查在稳定的神经系统中的可靠性 队列中,选择所有受试者是因为它们在NP时保持相同的NP功能水平 跟进。 使用基于PC的交互式驾驶模拟器对两组进行SDLP评估,该模拟器包括 显示器,方向盘和制动/加速踏板的踏板。要求参与者保持 保持恒定速度(55 mph)并响应分散的注意力任务时的车道位置 在显示器的一角。第2组完成了一个现有的标准化方案(TOPS), 而第1组则完成了新开发的驾驶场景。两种模拟都持续了 大约7分钟。 结果。第一组的综合可靠性为0.74。 HIV-的重测信度为0.68 而HIV +受试者则为0.83。对于第2组,SDLP与NP显着相关 在受试者受损的情况下在基线(r = .5,p = .005)和随访(r = .48,p = .006)时起作用

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号