【24h】

Frequency Analyses in Railway Vehicle Dynamics Simulation

机译:铁路车辆动力学仿真中的频率分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

High level of vertical acceleration vibration, which was far beyond specification requirements for one locomotive equipped with radial bogie, was measured in track testing. The result of the track testing indicates that it has good lateral and curve negotiating performance. But its vertical vibration acceleration reaches a high level. According to this problem, frequency components from tests are compared with the results of simulation in detail. However, the results of regular nonlinear calculation in time domain show that its vertical dynamical performance should be excellent. It's a more nervous problem because the track tests show the vertical dynamic of the locomotive is much worse. Based on the study of parameters in suspension and bogie structural characteristics, it is confirmed that the problem is caused by the arrangement of the braking unit, which is mounted on steering beam and the primary longitudinal stiffness of the middle wheel-set in suspension. When the wheel-sets are under the vertical impact of rail gap, the friction coupler of the equipment can't slide smoothly. Thus makes the rigid joint come into being at the ends of the primary vertical suspension, causing the abnormal vertical vibration of locomotive. Analyses based on a simple model, show that friction coupler between the braking unit and the axle box will cause a 6 Hz car-body response peak. The trend results the 8.4 Hz car-body which is bending with modal vibration dominated in frequency response during track testing. It is expected to reduce the greater response 8.4 Hz. It can be obtained from track testing if the friction coupler is removed. There are two methods used in railway vehicle dynamics simulation commonly. One is the linear frequency analyses; the other is the non-linear calculation in time domain. Among them, the time of the linear frequency analyses method is quite shorter than the non-linear calculation. And using the former can make a judgment of the function of the system quickly. Moreover, in some cases, we can't get a real analysis if we only take the non-linear calculation method in time domain. Through the linear frequency analyses, we can know much more of the manifestation in its essence than the nonlinear method. So when carrying the response analyses in the suspension system of the railway vehicle, we should adopt the linear frequency analyses first, for the non-linear analyses has some chanciness, and it can't representation the characteristics of the system.
机译:在轨道测试中测得高水平的垂直加速度振动,这远远超出了一辆配备径向转向架的机车的规格要求。跟踪测试的结果表明它具有良好的横向和曲线协商性能。但是其垂直振动加速度达到很高的水平。根据这个问题,将测试的频率成分与仿真结果进行详细比较。然而,时域规则非线性计算的结果表明,其垂直动力性能应该是优良的。这是一个更加紧张的问题,因为跟踪测试表明机车的垂直动态要差得多。通过对悬架参数和转向架结构特性的研究,可以确定该问题是由安装在转向梁上的制动单元的布置以及悬架中轮副的主要纵向刚度引起的。当轮对在导轨间隙的垂直冲击下时,设备的摩擦耦合器无法平稳滑动。从而使刚性接头在一次垂直悬架的端部产生,引起机车的竖向异常振动。基于简单模型的分析表明,制动单元与轴箱之间的摩擦耦合器将导致6 Hz的车身响应峰值。这种趋势导致8.4 Hz的车身弯曲,并在轨道测试过程中以模态振动弯曲,而该振动以频率响应为主。期望将更大的响应降低8.4 Hz。如果卸下了摩擦联轴器,则可以从轨道测试中获得。通常在铁路车辆动力学仿真中使用两种方法。一种是线性频率分析;另一种是线性频率分析。另一个是时域的非线性计算。其中,线性频率分析方法的时间比非线性计算的时间短得多。并且使用前者可以快速判断系统的功能。此外,在某些情况下,如果仅采用时域中的非线性计算方法,我们将无法获得真实的分析。通过线性频率分析,我们可以比非线性方法更了解其本质。因此在铁路车辆悬架系统中进行响应分析时,应首先采用线性频率分析,因为非线性分析具有一定的机械性,不能代表系统的特性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号