【24h】

REFRACTIVITY MODELS FOUND THROUGH THE ANALYTICAL METHOD

机译:通过分析方法建立的折光率模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There are totally 18 kinds of refractivity models in all potential polished faces for gem crystals. In actual refractivity measurements, only 15 models are recognizable. For all anisotropic gems, a maximum index of refractivity, a minimum index of refractivity, and a birefringence can be determined directly from its corresponding refractivity model. The recognization of "groove-shape" on a face that intersects obliquely its z-axis in a uniaxial gem makes it possible to differentiate itself from a model of biaxial gem. As a result, we can undoubtedly distinguish an isotropic gem, a uniaxial gem and a biaxial gem. Because of the difference between the "groove-shape" model in an uniaxial gem and the "sawtooth-shape" model in a biaxial gem, we are able to directly determine optical sign from six kinds of refractivity modle that were so alike in pair that we weren't able to distinguish them before (Table 1: e and h; f and g; j and k). We still cannot determine optical sign in the following refractivity models: b, m, and o yet in Fig. 1.
机译:宝石晶体的所有潜在抛光面中共有18种折射率模型。在实际的折射率测量中,只能识别15个模型。对于所有各向异性宝石,可以直接从其相应的折射率模型确定最大折射率,最小折射率和双折射。在单轴宝石中,斜向相交于其z轴的面上的“凹槽形状”的识别使自己有可能与双轴宝石的模型区分开。结果,我们无疑可以区分出各向同性的宝石,单轴的宝石和双轴的宝石。由于单轴宝石中的“凹槽形状”模型和双轴宝石中的“锯齿形状”模型之间的差异,我们能够直接从成对的六种折射率模型中直接确定光学符号我们以前无法区分它们(表1:e和h; f和g; j和k)。我们仍然无法在以下折射率模型中确定光学信号:图1中的b,m和o。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号