【24h】

AN ASSESSMENT OF METHODS FOR MONITORING ENTRANCE SURFACEDOSE IN FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES

机译:荧光引导干预过程中进入表面监测方法的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the light of a growing awareness of the risks of inducing skin injuries as a consequence of fluoroscopicallyrnguided interventional procedures (FGIPs), this paper compares three methods of monitoring entrance surfacerndose (ESD) It also reports measurements of ESDs made during the period August 1998 to June 1999 on 137rnpatients undergoing cardiac, neurological and general FGIPs. Although the sample is small, the results reinforcernthe need for routine assessments to be made of ESDs in FGIPs. At present, the most reliable and accurate formrnof ESD measurement would seem to be arrays of TLDs. However, transducer based methods, although likely tornbe less accurate, have considerable advantages in relation to a continuous monitoring programme. It is alsornsuggested that there may be the potential locally for threshold dose area product (DAP) values to be set forrnspecific procedures. These could be used to provide early warning of the potential for skin injuries.
机译:鉴于人们越来越意识到使用荧光镜引导下的介入程序(FGIP)导致皮肤受伤的风险,本文比较了三种监测入口表面剂量(ESD)的方法。该报告还报告了1998年8月至2007年期间进行的ESD测量1999年6月,对137名接受心脏,神经和普通FGIP手术的患者进行了检查。尽管样本很小,但结果表明需要对FGIP中的ESD进行常规评估。目前,最可靠,最准确的formrnof ESD测量似乎是TLD的阵列。但是,基于传感器的方法尽管可能会变得不太准确,但相对于连续监视程序而言却具有相当大的优势。还建议针对特定程序设置阈值剂量面积乘积(DAP)值可能会局部存在。这些可以用来提早警告潜在的皮肤伤害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号