【24h】

Simulator Data Collection Requirements for HRA Studies

机译:HRA研究的模拟器数据收集要求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

HRA studies have for long while depended on a combination of expert judgment estimates, Swain Handbook numbers and from accident reports, see for a critique of HRA methods. Simulator data collection sessions have been carried world-wide , including the Electric Power Research Institute sponsored Operator Reliability Experiments, the simulator studies sponsored by the USNRC and Electricite De France. There has not been a total acceptance of the fact that simulator is the best approximation to the responses of operators during accident situations and the way to ensure that the HRA represents the actual crews responses to accidents. Training departments carryout a series of accident scenarios and these can be used for HRA purposes. A number of books on human error have focused upon a set of nuclear and other accidents to the exclusion of the simulator exercises as a source of data or basis for expert judgment estimates. This seems to be strange in that the simulator communities have tried to make the simulator as representative of reality as possible. But on the other hand, HRA experts and practitioners are often prepared to accept the judgments of operators in making human error probability estimates, when the operators' experience is obtained from the selfsame simulators! Finally, there appears to be a move among some researchers and organizations to accept the conclusion that the simulator is the best tool that we have and to begin to plan how to use the simulator for HRA purposes. The training communities use the simulators as a tool for training, but for the most part their use is very much in the tradition of the old apprenticeship system. It is our view that the basis of the Systematic Approach to Training (SAT) depends on the close relationship between measurement of operator performance and the modification of the learning objectives and their execution. The quality of data collected and analyzed could be improved, see. There is a natural relationship between the training needs and those of the HRA.
机译:HRA研究长期以来一直依赖于专家判断估计,Swain手册编号以及事故报告的组合,有关HRA方法的评论,请参见。模拟器数据收集会议已在全球范围内进行,包括电力研究所赞助的操作员可靠性实验,由美国国家研究委员会和法国电力公司赞助的模拟器研究。尚未完全接受这样一个事实,即模拟器是对事故情况下操作员响应的最佳近似,也是一种确保HRA代表实际机组人员对事故响应的方式。培训部门执行一系列事故情况,这些情况可用于HRA。许多关于人为错误的书籍都将重点放在一系列核事故和其他事故上,而将模拟器演习排除在外,而不是将其作为数据来源或专家判断估计的基础。这似乎很奇怪,因为模拟器社区试图使模拟器尽可能代表现实。但是,另一方面,HRA专家和从业人员在从相同的模拟器中获得操作员的经验时,往往准备接受操作员的判断,以进行人为错误概率估计!最后,似乎有一些研究人员和组织开始采取行动,接受模拟器是我们拥有的最佳工具的结论,并开始计划如何将模拟器用于HRA。培训社区将模拟器用作培训工具,但在很大程度上,它们的使用在很大程度上是旧的学徒制的传统。我们认为,系统培训方法(SAT)的基础取决于操作员绩效的衡量与学习目标及其执行之间的密切关系。可以提高收集和分析的数据质量。培训需求与HRA的需求之间存在自然的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号