首页> 外文会议>International conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management : Book of abstracts >'UNDERSTANDING RISK AND SUSTAINABILITY - THE FUTUREFOR RISK MANAGERS?'
【24h】

'UNDERSTANDING RISK AND SUSTAINABILITY - THE FUTUREFOR RISK MANAGERS?'

机译:“了解风险和可持续性-风险管理者的未来?”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The way people define risk has significant repercussions for the way risks are identifiedrnand the way they are managed. Risk professionals see risk as a combination of the consequences of anrnevent and the likelihood of an event with those consequences occurring (technical risk). However, asrnSandman has pointed out, society's view of risk equates with hazard plus outrage (sociological risk).rnIn other words we concentrate on calculating the risk, identifying the controls in place, determiningrnthe residual risk, and assessing on that basis if we will accept the risk or not. The community'srnresponse, however, equates to the level of outrage the event produces.rnSustainability, likewise, has many definitions and encompasses anything from social justice issues andrnthe environment to how an organisation can continue to survive a globally competitive environment.rnOf recent times organisations have been looking at triple or quadruple bottom line reporting and havernstarted identifying sustainability as a risk (both threat and opportunity) they must manage tornincreasingly greater levels in the future. The nature of sustainability risk is seen as new and emerging,rndifferent to the risks that organisations and risk managers have traditionally faced, and one that willrnrequire different solutions than those that caused it to become an issue in the first place.rnWhile this may be true it is the contention of this paper that risk and sustainability are two sides of thernone coin and are therefore inextricably linked. One cannot be understood without the other.rnA holistic model is put forward that clearly identifies the link and demonstrates how an understandingrnof both risk and sustainability will be essential for future decision making.
机译:人们定义风险的方式对识别风险的方式和管理方式有重大影响。风险专业人员将风险视为不良事件的后果以及事件与这些后果发生的可能性(技术风险)的组合。然而,正如阿斯·桑德曼(asrnSandman)所指出的那样,社会对风险的看法等同于危害与暴行(社会学风险)。换句话说,我们专注于计算风险,确定适当的控制措施,确定剩余风险并在此基础上评估是否接受冒险与否。但是,社区的反应等同于事件产生的愤怒程度。可持续性同样具有许多定义,涵盖从社会正义问题,环境到组织如何能够在全球竞争环境中继续生存的所有内容。一直在研究三重或四重底线报告,还没有开始将可持续性视为风险(威胁和机遇),他们必须在未来将其管理的水平不断提高。可持续性风险的性质被视为新兴事物,与组织和风险管理者传统上面临的风险不同,并且将需要与导致其成为首要问题的解决方案不同的解决方案。本文的论点是,风险和可持续性是成功的两面,因此有着千丝万缕的联系。一个人不能没有另一个人就无法理解。提出了一个整体模型,该模型可以清楚地识别链接,并说明对风险和可持续性的理解对于未来决策至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号