首页> 外文会议>International conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management >'UNDERSTANDING RISK AND SUSTAINABILITY - THE FUTURE FOR RISK MANAGERS?'
【24h】

'UNDERSTANDING RISK AND SUSTAINABILITY - THE FUTURE FOR RISK MANAGERS?'

机译:“了解风险和可持续性 - 风险管理人员的未来?”

获取原文

摘要

The way people define risk has significant repercussions for the way risks are identified and the way they are managed. Risk professionals see risk as a combination of the consequences of an event and the likelihood of an event with those consequences occurring (technical risk). However, as Sandman has pointed out, society's view of risk equates with hazard plus outrage (sociological risk). In other words we concentrate on calculating the risk, identifying the controls in place, determining the residual risk, and assessing on that basis if we will accept the risk or not. The community's response, however, equates to the level of outrage the event produces. Sustainability, likewise, has many definitions and encompasses anything from social justice issues and the environment to how an organisation can continue to survive a globally competitive environment. Of recent times organisations have been looking at triple or quadruple bottom line reporting and have started identifying sustainability as a risk (both threat and opportunity) they must manage to increasingly greater levels in the future. The nature of sustainability risk is seen as new and emerging, different to the risks that organisations and risk managers have traditionally faced, and one that will require different solutions than those that caused it to become an issue in the first place. While this may be true it is the contention of this paper that risk and sustainability are two sides of the one coin and are therefore inextricably linked. One cannot be understood without the other. A holistic model is put forward that clearly identifies the link and demonstrates how an understanding of both risk and sustainability will be essential for future decision making.
机译:人们定义风险的方式对于确定的风险和管理方式具有显着影响。风险专业人员将风险视为事件后果的组合以及事件发生的可能性(技术风险)。然而,正如桑德曼所指出的那样,社会的风险看法随着危险加愤怒(社会风险)等同。换句话说,我们专注于计算风险,识别到位的控制,确定残余风险,并根据我们接受风险的基础评估。然而,社区的反应等同于事件产生的愤怒水平。同样的可持续性具有许多定义,并包括社会正义问题的任何事情以及如何将组织如何继续在全球竞争环境中生存的环境。最近的时代组织一直在寻找三倍或四轮线条报告,并开始将可持续性确定为风险(威胁和机会),他们必须在未来越来越大的水平。可持续性风险的性质被视为新的和新兴,与组织和风险管理人员传统上面临的风险不同,以及需要不同的解决方案的风险,而不是导致它成为第一名问题的解决方案。虽然这可能是真的,但是这篇论文的争论,风险和可持续性是一个硬币的两侧,因此有线不可接近。没有另一个,一个人不能被理解。提出了整体模型,清楚地确定了联系并表明如何理解风险和可持续性的理解对于未来的决策至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号