首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Politics and Information Systems: Technologies and Applications(PISTA 2004) vol.1: Informatics and Society >A Preliminary Examination of Public Opinion in Australia on the Use of Biometric Devices or Identifiers in Everyday Life
【24h】

A Preliminary Examination of Public Opinion in Australia on the Use of Biometric Devices or Identifiers in Everyday Life

机译:关于在日常生活中使用生物识别设备或标识符的澳大利亚公众舆论的初步审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Since the September 11,2001 terrorist attacks in New York City, many countries including Australia have been able to justify the use of biometric devices for identification and surveillance of their own citizens and others in the name of national security.This paper reports on the preliminary findings of a survey that examined Australians views and experiences with the use of biometric devices in everyday situations in the context of their potential to serve as a 'Panopticon' to keep the nation's citizenry under surveillance. It discusses the adoption of the new communication technology from the point of view of the Justification model that sees technology choice as social gambling and the pluralist view of technology that sees technology as neutral in itself but as having negative or positivc effects on society based on how it is used.The paper proposes the need for Australian society to balance citizens' right to privacy and civil liberties with the right to stay alive and safe from terrorism and how it may be done with the necessary legal and regulatory safeguards.
机译:自2001年9月11日在纽约市发生恐怖袭击以来,包括澳大利亚在内的许多国家已经能够以国家安全的名义证明使用生物识别设备来识别和监视其本国公民及其他人。一项调查的结果,该调查研究了澳大利亚人在日常情况下使用生物识别设备的看法和经验,并考虑了其可能成为“ Panopticon”,以保持对澳大利亚公民的监视。从正当性模型的角度讨论了新通信技术的采用,该模型将技术选择视为社会赌博,并从技术的多元化观点将技术本身视为中立,但对社会产生了负面或正面影响,具体取决于如何本文提出,澳大利亚社会有必要在公民的隐私权和公民自由权与生存和免受恐怖主义侵害的权利之间取得平衡,以及如何通过必要的法律和法规保障措施来做到这一点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号