首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Informatics for Environmental Protection(ENVIROINFO IENNA 2002) pt.2; 20020925-20020927; Vienna; AT >Scientific Controversies as a Source of Environmental Information: The Case of Sulphate Odour from a Swedish Paper Mill in the Early 20th Century
【24h】

Scientific Controversies as a Source of Environmental Information: The Case of Sulphate Odour from a Swedish Paper Mill in the Early 20th Century

机译:作为环境信息来源的科学争论:20世纪初来自瑞典造纸厂的硫酸盐气味案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Sociologists and science theorists have shown an increased interest in the explicit study of scientific controversies. In this paper we claim that the study of scientific controversies over environmental issues may represent an important source of environmental information for the public, for policy makers, the conflict thus shapes environmental values and ultimately policy. For instance, by highlighting the uncertainties of environmental science, people are encouraged to focus their attention on environmental risks, values and tradeoffs per se and not only on scientific "facts" provided by experts. This paper exemplifies this notion by considering an early science-based conflict over air and water pollution from a Swedish paper mill in the early 20th century. We analyse in particular how the scientific controversy affected the publics and the policy makers view of the pollution problem. The paper also provides some general observations about the value of scientific controversies in shaping environmental policy.
机译:社会学家和科学理论家对科学争议的明确研究显示出越来越浓厚的兴趣。在本文中,我们声称对环境问题的科学争议研究可能代表了公众的重要环境信息来源,对于政策制定者而言,冲突由此塑造了环境价值并最终形成了政策。例如,通过强调环境科学的不确定性,鼓励人们将注意力集中在环境风险,价值和权衡本身上,而不仅仅是专家提供的科学“事实”上。本文通过考虑20世纪初瑞典造纸厂在空气和水污染方面基于科学的早期冲突来举例说明此概念。我们特别分析科学争论如何影响公众以及政策制定者对污染问题的看法。本文还提供了一些有关科学争议在制定环境政策方面的价值的一般观察。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号