【24h】

A Comparison of Crude Oil Fouling Using Two Different Probes

机译:两种不同探针对原油结垢的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A variety of different fouling rigs, each with its own advantages and disadvantages is available to assess crudernoil fouling. In this research, fouling of three crude oils are compared, using two electrically heated annular probes withrnstrikingly different modes of operation. The Hot Liquid Process Simulator (HLPS) was operated in single-pass mode,rnunder creeping flow conditions for time durations of a few hours at constant surface temperature. The PortablernFouling Research Unit (PFRU) was operated at velocities a factor of 250 higher, and followed the fouling process overrntwo or more days at constant heat flux, using re-circulation of the crude oil. Three crude oils were tested at averagernsurface temperatures in the range 225-380°C, and bulk temperatures roughly 100°C lower. Fouling rates were twornorders of magnitude greater in the low velocity unit. Relative ranking of the fouling potentials for the three oils isrndiscussed.
机译:可以使用各种不同的污垢试验台,每种都有各自的优点和缺点,以评估原油的结垢情况。在这项研究中,使用两个电加热的环形探针(操作模式截然不同)比较了三种原油的结垢情况。热液体过程模拟器(HLPS)在蠕动流动条件下以单程模式运行,在恒定的表面温度下持续了几个小时的时间。便携式结垢研究装置(PFRU)的运行速度提高了250倍,并且在结垢过程中以恒定的热通量连续两天或更长时间使用了原油的再循环。在225-380°C的平均表面温度下测试了三种原油,散装温度低了约100°C。在低速装置中,结垢率高出两个数量级。讨论了三种油的潜在结垢的相对等级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号