首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies; 20040905-09; Vancouver(CA) >THE COAL-SEQ PROJECT: KEY RESULTS FROM FIELD, LABORATORY, AND MODELING STUDIES
【24h】

THE COAL-SEQ PROJECT: KEY RESULTS FROM FIELD, LABORATORY, AND MODELING STUDIES

机译:COAL-SEQ项目:现场,实验室和建模研究的主要结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In October 2000, a multi-year government-industry R&D collaboration known as the Coal-Seq project was launched in the United States. Participants in the project include the U.S. Department of Energy as the project sponsor, Advanced Resources International, Burlington Resources, and BP America. The project objectives are to evaluate the feasibility of CO_2 sequestration in deep, unmineable coalseams using enhanced coalbed methane (ECBM) recovery technology. The Coal-Seq project is achieving its objectives via reservoir simulation studies of existing ECBM pilot projects in the San Juan basin, laboratory modeling studies of coal behavior, technical and economic sensitivity studies, and assessments of the potential and economic performance for ECBM recovery and CO_2 sequestration in deep, unmineable coals. Since its inception, and now in its final year, many important findings have emerged from the project, some of the more notable being: 1. CO_2 injection into coal can significantly improve methane recovery. At the Allison Unit CO_2-ECBM pilot in the San Juan basin, methane recovery was improved from 77% to 95% of original gas in place within the central pilot area. 2. Coal permeability and CO_2 injectivity was substantially reduced with CO_2 injection (by up to an order of magnitude near the wells, and extending to an estimated 1,000 ft from the wellbores). This has a detrimental effect to ECBM/sequestration economics. 3. While existing reservoir simulation models yield essentially similar results, the theoretical models they are based upon for multi-component sorption, diffusion and phase behavior may not accurately replicate actual reservoir behavior. Specifically, coal swelling cannot be adequately modeled in a dynamic fashion. 4. N_2-ECBM appears more economically favorable than CO_2-ECBM. However, from a carbon sequestration perspective, a gas comprising of mostly CO_2 appears the most favorable. 5. A technical/economic sensitivity has shed light on the most favorable coal conditions for sequestration. These include deep, high-rank coals with low permeability and that have not been previously developed for conventional coalbed methane production. However, this assumes technology is developed to overcome reduced injectivity due to matrix swelling. 6. An assessment of CO_2-ECBM/sequestration potential in the U.S. suggests a potential resource of 150 Tcf of gas and a sequestration capacity of 90 Gt of CO_2 exists.
机译:2000年10月,在美国发起了多年的政府与行业研发合作,称为Coal-Seq项目。该项目的参与者包括美国能源部(作为项目发起人),Advanced Resources International,Burlington Resources和BP America。该项目的目标是评估使用增强型煤层气(ECBM)回收技术在深不可开采的煤层中封存CO_2的可行性。 Coal-Seq项目正在通过圣胡安盆地现有ECBM试点项目的储层模拟研究,煤行为的实验室模型研究,技术和经济敏感性研究以及ECBM回收和CO_2的潜力和经济绩效评估来实现其目标。隔离在深不可采的煤中。自项目开始到现在,直到最后一年,该项目已产生了许多重要发现,其中更值得注意的是:1.向煤中注入CO_2可以显着提高甲烷的回收率。在圣胡安盆地的Allison单元CO_2-ECBM试点中,中央试点区域内甲烷的采收率从原始天然气的77%提高到95%。 2.随着CO_2的注入,煤的渗透率和CO_2的注入量大大降低了(在井附近增加了一个数量级,并延伸至距井筒约1000英尺)。这对ECBM /固存经济学有不利影响。 3.尽管现有的油藏模拟模型产生的结果基本相似,但它们基于多组分吸附,扩散和相行为的理论模型可能无法准确地复制实际的油藏行为。具体而言,煤膨胀不能以动态方式适当地建模。 4. N_2-ECBM在经济上似乎比CO_2-ECBM更有利。然而,从碳固存的角度来看,主要包含CO_2的气体似乎是最有利的。 5.对技术/经济的敏感性揭示了最有利于封存的煤炭条件。这些包括低渗透性的深层高级煤,这些煤以前尚未开发用于常规煤层气生产。但是,这是假设开发了技术来克服由于基质膨胀而导致的注射性降低的问题。 6.在美国对CO_2-ECBM /固存潜力的评估表明,天然气的潜在资源为150 Tcf,固存能力为90 Gt。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号