【24h】

MODELLING THE FLOW IN CURVED TIDAL CHANNELS AND RIVERS

机译:模拟弯曲的潮汐河道和河流的流动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Flows in tidal channel bends and river bends are very shallow and mildly curved free surface flows. The shallowness and the curvature of the flow lead to a few flow features which are difficult to reproduce with numerical models. An example is the second counter-rotating secondary flow cell that is observed along steep outer banks in river bends. This second cell has important consequences for the undermining of the outer bank. Only in relatively deep flows RANS-models do succeed in reproducing this second cell. Understandably the shallowness of this kind of flows leads to a preference for 2-D horizontal models. However, it is well known that due to differential advection main flow momentum is advected from the region of low velocity at the inside bend to the region with high velocity near the outside bend. Thus a negative eddy viscosity is required in a 2-D model, which however leads to stability problems. In 3-D computations there is no problem as the secondary flow and its advection effects are included in the computation. In curved shallow free surface flow another negative eddy viscosity phenomenon was observed, however. If the shear stress component that transports main flow across the channel is expressed as a gradient type of momentum transport, then again a negative eddy viscosity appears. This means that 3-D computations with gradient type turbulence models (e.g. eddy viscosity or k-ε models) can never yield such a stress component with the correct sign. The negative eddy viscosity can be understood by looking at the mechanism that creates the shear stresses, in this case parcels of water that move upwards and downwards over the flow retaining a substantial part of their original momentum. If we describe the exchange of momentum with a kind of vertical mixing length model, the same mixing length leads to correct shear stresses for all three stress components. In contradistinction to gradient type turbulence models, large eddy simulation (LES) does yield correct shear stresses.
机译:潮汐河道弯道和河道弯道中的水流非常浅,弯曲度很低,自由表面流。流动的浅度和曲率导致一些流动特征,这些特征很难用数值模型重现。一个例子是在河弯沿陡峭的外岸观察到的第二个反向旋转的二次流动池。第二个单元对于外部银行的破坏具有重要的后果。只有在相对较深的流中,RANS模型才能成功复制第二个单元。可以理解,这种流动的浅度导致了对二维水平模型的偏好。但是,众所周知,由于差动对流,主流动量从内侧弯曲处的低速区域向外侧弯曲附近的高速度区域对流。因此,在二维模型中需要负涡流粘度,但是这会导致稳定性问题。在3-D计算中没有问题,因为二次流及其对流效应已包含在计算中。然而,在弯曲的浅自由表面流中,还观察到另一种负涡旋现象。如果将跨通道传输主流的切应力分量表示为动量传输的梯度类型,则会再次出现负涡流粘度。这意味着使用梯度类型湍流模型(例如涡流粘度或k-ε模型)进行的3-D计算永远不会产生具有正确符号的应力分量。可以通过查看产生剪切应力的机理来理解负涡流粘度,在这种情况下,在整个流动过程中向上和向下移动的水流会保留大部分原始动量。如果我们用一种垂直混合长度模型描述动量交换,则相同的混合长度会导致所有三个应力分量的剪切应力正确。与梯度型湍流模型相反,大涡模拟(LES)确实会产生正确的切应力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号