【24h】

The 'Dance or Work' Problem: Why Do not all Honeybees Dance with Maximum Intensity

机译:“跳舞还是工作”问题:为什么不是所有的蜜蜂都以最大的强度跳舞

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A honeybee colony has to choose among several nectar sources in the environment, each fluctuating in quality over time. Successful forager bees return to the hive and perform dances to describe the food sources they have found. Each dancer tries to recruit other forager bees to fly to the source it has found. Some individual dancers clearly dance longer for higher quality sources, other dancers distinguish little between poor and good sources; presumably the differences are genetically based. Our multi-agent simulation showed that this individual heterogeneity results in optimal collective exploitation of the environment. Under all tested environmental conditions near-natural heterogeneous colonies worked more efficiently than artificially homogeneous ones. In heterogeneous colonies, dances last sufficiently long to recruit an appropriate number of waiting dance-following bees. In homogeneous colonies with good discriminating bees, the dances last longer than is efficient; the extra dancing decreases net food gains per time.
机译:蜜蜂群必须在环境中的几种花蜜来源中进行选择,每种来源的质量都会随着时间而波动。成功的觅食蜂返回蜂巢并进行舞蹈以描述他们发现的食物来源。每个舞者都试图招募其他觅食蜂,以飞向发现的源头。有些舞者显然会为更高质量的舞者跳舞更长的时间,而另一些舞者却在好舞者和好舞者之间没有什么区别。大概差异是基于遗传的。我们的多主体仿真表明,这种个体异质性导致对环境的最佳集体开发。在所有测试的环境条件下,近乎自然的异质菌落比人工均质的菌落更有效。在异类殖民地,舞蹈的持续时间足够长,可以招募到适当数量的等待舞蹈的蜜蜂。在具有良好识别能力的蜂群中,舞蹈的持续时间长于有效舞蹈。额外的跳舞会减少每次的净食物收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号