【24h】

DOES THE BEDLOAD EQUATION OF MEYER-PETER AND MULLER FIT ITS OWN DATA?

机译:Meerer-Peter和Muller的载重方程是否适合其自身数据?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

One of the most famous bedload transport relations in the literature is that of Meyer-Peter and Muellen In the 54 years since its introduction, however, the equation and the data on which it is based do not appear to have been the subject of careful revisitation. Meyer-Peter and Mueller subjected their experimental data obtained at E.T.H. to thorough procedures by which side wall and bedform effects were removed from the boundary shear stress applied by the fluid flowing over the sediment bed before fitting a bedload equation. This bedload equation was developed for an ample range of discharges under normal flow conditions, with uniform materials and sediment mixtures of different values of specific gravity, with and without the presence of bedforms. It is demonstrated here, however, that the procedure for removing bedform effects consistently results in a bedform correction applied to data for which bedforms were not in fact observed. When the bedform correction is abandoned and the sidewall correction is amended to that of Vanoni-Brooks, it is found that the bedload transport relation of Meyer-Peter and Muller overpredicts the E.T.H. and Gilbert data lacking bedforms by a factor of 2.0 to 2.5. An amended version of the relation is presented here for the case of plane-bed conditions.
机译:文献中最著名的床载运输关系之一是迈耶·彼得(Meyer-Peter)和穆伦(Muellen),但自问世以来的54年间,方程式和所基于的数据似乎并没有成为仔细研究的主题。 。 Meyer-Peter和Mueller接受了在E.T.H.彻底的程序,在拟合床荷方程之前,应从流过沉积床的流体施加的边界剪切应力中消除侧壁和床形效应。该床荷方程针对正常流量条件下的大量排放量开发而成,具有均匀的物料和具有不同比重值的沉积物混合物,有无床形。然而,在此证明,去除床形效果的过程始终导致将床形校正应用于实际上未观察到床形的数据。当放弃床形校正并将侧壁校正修改为Vanoni-Brooks的校正时,发现Meyer-Peter和Muller的床载运输关系过高地预测了E.T.H.和吉尔伯特(Gilbert)的数据缺乏床形2.0到2.5。对于飞机床情况,此处介绍了该关系的修订版本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号