【24h】

Online Privacy Statements: Are they Worth Reading?

机译:在线隐私声明:值得阅读吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Internet users have become increasingly concerned about data collection and data handling practices of Web sites. This issue has been explored in academic studies, focusing on the nature of users' privacy concerns (Hoffman, Novak, & Peralta, 1999; Cranor, Reagle, & Ackerman, 1999; Sheehan & Hoy, 2000), their awareness of privacy issues (Dommeyer & Gross, 2003), their willingness to provide information (Phelps, Nowak, & Ferrell, 2000), and the determinants of consumer trust (Schoenbachler & Gordon, 2002). To ease users' fears about data misuse, privacy policies have become de rigueur among U.S. commercial Web sites over the past couple of years (Messmer, 1997; Federal Trade Commission, 1998; Culnan, 1999; Federal Trade Commission, 2000; Liu & Arnett, 2002). Culnan and Milne (2001) found that the majority of Internet users do not read online privacy policies, primarily because they are too long, difficult to understand, and "all the same", as one survey respondent put it. The Platform for Privacy Preferences (P3P) and its XML-based, machine-readable privacy specifications may be a good alternative to traditional privacy policies, but as of 2003 only 10% of Web sites have P3P-based privacy policies (Cranor, Byers, & Kormann, 2003). Reasons for its slow adoption include unresolved legal issues and the fact that companies find it hard to squeeze their complicated privacy policies into the more straightforward P3P scheme (Thibodeau, 2002). Thus, privacy policies still have to be read by humans rather than Web browsers, and so their quality is critical to users' trust in Web sites. The present study examines 50 privacy statements from commercial Web sites in greater detail than the previous studies (Liu & Arnett, 2002; Miyazaki & Fernandez, 2000; Johnson-Page & Thatcher, 2001), focusing not just on the issues they address but also on the specific practices companies have adopted to collect, use and share customer data. The objective of this study is to determine how accurately privacy statements communicate data-handling practices, to what extent these practices respect user privacy, and whether companies displaying privacy seals handle user data more responsibly than companies without such a seal.
机译:互联网用户越来越关注网站的数据收集和数据处理实践。此问题已在学术研究中进行了探讨,重点关注用户隐私问题的性质(Hoffman,Novak和Peralta,1999年; Cranor,Reagle和Ackerman,1999年; Sheehan和Hoy,2000年),他们对隐私问题的认识( Dommeyer&Gross,2003年),他们提供信息的意愿(Phelps,Nowak和Ferrell,2000年)以及决定消费者信任度的因素(Schoenbachler和Gordon,2002年)。为了缓解用户对数据滥用的恐惧,过去几年来,隐私策略已成为美国商业网站中的必需措施(Messmer,1997; Federal Trade Commission,1998; Culnan,1999; Federal Trade Commission,2000; Liu&Arnett ,2002)。 Culnan和Milne(2001)发现,大多数互联网用户不阅读在线隐私政策,主要是因为它们太长,难以理解,并且“完全一样”,正如一位调查受访者所说。隐私权偏好平台(P3P)及其基于XML的机器可读隐私规范可能是传统隐私策略的很好替代方案,但自2003年起,只有10%的网站具有基于P3P的隐私策略(Cranor,Byers, &Kormann,2003)。其缓慢采用的原因包括尚未解决的法律问题,以及公司发现难以将其复杂的隐私政策挤入更直接的P3P方案的事实(Thibodeau,2002年)。因此,隐私策略仍然必须由人类而不是Web浏览器阅读,因此隐私策略的质量对于用户对Web站点的信任至关重要。本研究比以前的研究(Liu&Arnett,2002; Miyazaki&Fernandez,2000; Johnson-Page&Thatcher,2001)更详细地研究了来自商业网站的50条隐私声明,不仅关注它们解决的问题,而且还关注关于公司收集,使用和共享客户数据的具体做法。这项研究的目的是确定隐私声明如何准确地传达数据处理实践,这些实践在多大程度上尊重用户隐私,以及显示隐私密封的公司是否比没有这种密封的公司更负责任地处理用户数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号