首页> 外文会议>Industrial and environmental applications of direct and large-eddy simulation >LES of turbulence and turbulent combustion: advances and theoretical limitations
【24h】

LES of turbulence and turbulent combustion: advances and theoretical limitations

机译:湍流和湍流燃烧LES:研究进展和理论局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Large Eddy Simulations account for the subgrid velocity fluctuations ina model (analytic) way. It is argued that due to small-scale intermittency, the LES models based on the Kolmogorov-Smagorinki phenomenology must fail for any mesh size #DELTA# when the Reynolds number is large enough and #DELTA# corresponds to the scales in the inertial range. Physically, the existing phenomenology treats very strong and weak fluctuations on the equal footing as governed by the single parameter (mean dissipation rate). This leads to unreasonably large overproduction of kinetic energy and, as a consequence, poor predictions. Intermittency disappears at the large scales and that is why the time-dependent VLES schemes are much more successfull in descibing hi Reynolds number flows. Various examples, presented in the paper support this point of view.
机译:大涡模拟以模型(解析)的方式解决了子网格速度波动的问题。据认为,由于小规模的间歇性,当雷诺数足够大且#DELTA#对应于惯性范围内的尺度时,基于Kolmogorov-Smagorinki现象学的LES模型对于任何网格大小#DELTA#都必须失败。从物理上讲,现有的现象学在相同的基础上处理由单个参数(平均耗散率)控制的强弱波动。这会导致动能过大地过度生产,结果导致预测不佳。间歇性在很大程度上消失了,这就是为什么时间相关的VLES方案在描述雷诺数流方面更成功的原因。本文中提供的各种示例都支持这种观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号