【24h】

The role of erosion rate formulation on the ignition and subsidence of turbidity current

机译:腐蚀速率公式对浊度电流着火和沉陷的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An empirical relationship describing the entrainment of suspended sediment is required even if a vertical structure model is used for modeling turbidity currents. Several relationships can be found in the literature for estimating the entrainment rate of suspended sediment. Turbidity currents at laboratory scale are primarily depositional and the model prediction is not sensitive to the specified entrainment relationship. At the field scale however, turbidity currents are more likely to be erosional and the predicted results can be quite sensitive to the entrainment relations used in the model. Here, the four-equation model of turbidity current is utilized to revisit the ignition and subsiding conditions of turbidity currents originally described in the seminal work of Parker et al. (1986). Three different sediment entrainment models are considered. The ignition conditions are studied for a variety of parameters such as sediment size, slope and inflow current thickness. It has been found that steeper slopes and finer sediment gives lower values of ignition velocity and sediment concentration. The ignition Richardson number is found to be strongly dependent on the slope and insensitive to the sediment size. The ignition condition has been found to be quite sensitive to the entrainment relation used in the computation. The phase diagrams describing ignition conditions, and igniting and subsiding regions obtained from different erosion models are generally similar. The auto-suspension generation line dividing the zones of ignition and subsidence are found to be different for different entrainment relationship. As a result, a turbidity current predicted to be subsiding by one entrainment relation could turn out to be igniting when a different entrainment model is used. This has important implication in the modeling of turbidity current as the same numerical model can give completely different prediction depending on which entrainment relation is used.
机译:即使使用垂直结构模型来模拟浊流,也需要建立经验关系来描述悬浮泥沙的夹带。在文献中可以找到几种关系来估计悬浮沉积物的夹带率。实验室规模的浊流主要是沉积物,模型预测对指定的夹带关系不敏感。但是,在现场范围内,浊流更容易被侵蚀,预测结果对模型中使用的夹带关系可能非常敏感。在这里,浊度电流的四方程模型被用来回顾最初在Parker等人的开创性工作中描述的浊度电流的点火和沉降条件。 (1986)。考虑了三种不同的泥沙夹带模型。研究了各种条件下的着火条件,例如沉积物大小,斜率和流入电流厚度。已经发现,较陡的坡度和较细的沉积物给出较低的着火速度和沉积物浓度值。发现引燃理查森数与坡度密切相关,对沉积物大小不敏感。已经发现点火条件对计算中使用的夹带关系非常敏感。从不同腐蚀模型获得的描述点火条件,点火区域和下陷区域的相图通常相似。发现对于不同的夹带关系,划分起火和沉降区域的自动悬架产生线是不同的。结果,当使用不同的夹带模型时,预计会被一种夹带关系所抵消的浑浊电流可能会被点燃。这对于浊度电流的建模具有重要意义,因为相同的数值模型可以根据所使用的夹带关系给出完全不同的预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号