首页> 外文会议>Fatigue and fracture test planning, test data acquisitions and analysis >More Accurate Elastic Compliance Equation and Its Inverse Solution for Compact Specimens
【24h】

More Accurate Elastic Compliance Equation and Its Inverse Solution for Compact Specimens

机译:紧凑样本的更精确的弹性柔量方程及其逆解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper reinvestigates the compliance equation used in ASTM E1820, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness, for compact tension (C(T)) specimens. It is found that the elastic compliance equation is inconsistent with that determined from the stress intensity factor (K) solution that is also used in ASTM E1820 for the same compact specimens. Because the K solution in ASTM E1820 is very accurate, as verified by different finite element analysis (FEA) results, the compliance equation in ASTM E1820 can be less accurate, making it necessary to develop a more accurate solution. Using the shooting method and an accurate FEA result of elastic compliance at a/W= 0.5, the more accurate compliance values are obtained for ASTM E1820 C(T) specimens over a wide range of a/W by integration of the accurate K solution. The inverse solution of the new compliance equation is then obtained by curve fitting. The comparison shows that the proposed compliance inverse solution can determine very accurate crack length with negligible errors.
机译:本文重新研究了ASTM E1820中用于压缩张力(C(T))试样的断裂韧性测量标准测试方法中使用的顺从性方程式。发现弹性柔度方程式与根据应力强度因子(K)解决方案确定的方程式不一致,后者在ASTM E1820中也用于相同的紧凑样本。由于ASTM E1820中的K解非常精确,已通过不同的有限元分析(FEA)结果进行了验证,因此ASTM E1820中的柔度方程可能不太精确,因此有必要开发更精确的解决方案。使用射击方法和在a / W = 0.5时的弹性柔度的精确FEA结果,通过集成精确的K解决方案,可以在更大的a / W范围内获得ASTM E1820 C(T)标本的更准确的柔度值。然后通过曲线拟合获得新柔量方程的逆解。比较表明,所提出的柔量反解可以确定非常精确的裂纹长度,而误差可以忽略不计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号