【24h】

Comparison of three post-processing methods for acoustic localization

机译:三种声学定位后处理方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recently, the need of monitoring parking places, airports, and harbours has increased. Microwaves, infrared based techniques, vision, or acoustics are the key techniques but each of them requires a specific kind of postprocessing. Far field target localization methods based on Angle Of Arrival (AOA) often neglect the possibility of erroneous angle observations. Three different methods for increasing the accuracy of cross fixing based localization are compared. Average of the AOAs is easily corrupted by outliers, "m out of k"-selection of AOAs suffers from loss of data. Signal energy based target location circle is used to validate the cross fixing result, thus improving reliability. The energies of averaged target signals from two arrays are used to calculate a circle on which the target resides. Distance from the cross fixed location to the circle is used to validate the location. Experiments are carried out with simulated and real data.
机译:近来,监视停车位,机场和港口的需求增加了。微波,基于红外线的技术,视觉或声音是关键技术,但它们中的每一种都需要特定类型的后处理。基于到达角(AOA)的远场目标定位方法常常忽略了错误角度观测的可能性。比较了三种用于提高基于交叉固定的定位精度的方法。离群值的平均值很容易被离群值破坏,从“ k个选择中选出m个”,会丢失数据。基于信号能量的目标定位圆用于验证交叉固定结果,从而提高可靠性。来自两个阵列的平均目标信号的能量用于计算目标所在的圆。从十字固定位置到圆的距离用于验证位置。实验是用模拟和真实数据进行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号