首页> 外文会议>Conference on Medical Imaging 2008: Computer-Aided Diagnosis; 20080219-21; San Diego,CA(US) >Comparison of computer-aided diagnosis performance and radiologist readings on the LIDC pulmonary nodule dataset
【24h】

Comparison of computer-aided diagnosis performance and radiologist readings on the LIDC pulmonary nodule dataset

机译:LIDC肺结节数据集上计算机辅助诊断性能和放射线医生读数的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

One challenge facing radiologists is the characterization of whether a pulmonary nodule detected in a CT scan is likely to be benign or malignant. We have developed an image processing and machine learning based computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) method to support such decisions by estimating the likelihood of malignancy of pulmonary nodules. The system computes 192 image features which are combined with patient age to comprise the feature pool. We constructed an ensemble of 1000 linear discriminant classifiers using 1000 feature subsets selected from the feature pool using a random subspace method. The classifiers were trained on a dataset of 125 pulmonary nodules. The individual classifier results were combined using a majority voting method to form an ensemble estimate of the likelihood of malignancy. Validation was performed on nodules in the Lung Imaging Database Consortium (LIDC) dataset for which radiologist interpretations were available. We performed calibration to reduce the differences in the internal operating points and spacing between radiologist rating and the CADx algorithm. Comparing radiologists with the CADx in assigning nodules into four malignancy categories, fair agreement was observed (κ=0.381) while binary rating yielded an agreement of (κ=0.475), suggesting that CADx can be a promising second reader in a clinical setting.
机译:放射科医生面临的一个挑战是如何确定在CT扫描中检测到的肺结节是良性还是恶性的。我们已经开发了一种基于图像处理和机器学习的计算机辅助诊断(CADx)方法,通过估算肺结节恶性可能性来支持此类决策。该系统计算192个图像特征,这些图像特征与患者年龄相结合以构成特征池。我们使用随机子空间方法,使用从特征池中选择的1000个特征子集构建了1000个线性判别分类器的集合。在125个肺结节的数据集上对分类器进行了训练。使用多数表决方法将各个分类器的结果合并,以形成对恶性可能性的整体估计。对肺影像数据库协会(LIDC)数据集中的结节进行了验证,对于该结节,放射科医生可以进行解释。我们进行了校准,以减少内部操作点和放射线医师评分与CADx算法之间的距离差异。将放射科医师与CADx在将结节分为四个恶性类别中进行比较时,观察到了合理的一致性(κ= 0.381),而二进制评级得出的一致性则为(κ= 0.475),这表明CADx可以在临床上成为有希望的第二读者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号