【24h】

Misuse and nonuse of Knowledge-Based Systems: The past experiences revisited

机译:滥用和不使用基于知识的系统:回顾过去的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It is difficult to determine the number of expert systems or Knowledge-Based Systems (KBSs) that really are operational within companies or administrations. It seems that a large number of such systems have never been used in operations and a rich literature stresses this point. We think that most of these references do not address some dimensions that are of paramount importance. In this paper, we provide a review of the literature according to three neglected dimensions: (1) the differences between automatic KBSs and non-automatic KBSs; (2) the types and importance of decisions that are involved; and (3) the types of data acquisition that is required. Keeping in mind these three dimensions, we review the literature about the acceptance of KBS and their use and point out that most of the observations can be interpreted along these three dimensions. Furthermore, these dimensions permit us to explain some failures and difficulties that have already been pointed out in several scientific domains in which interactivity is crucial, such as Decision Support Systems (DSSs). Our approach brings some new insights on the problems of KBS acceptance and leads us to propose some recommendations.
机译:很难确定在公司或行政管理部门内实际运作的专家系统或基于知识的系统(KBS)的数量。似乎大量此类系统从未在运营中使用过,丰富的文献强调了这一点。我们认为,这些参考文献中的大多数都没有涉及到最重要的某些方面。在本文中,我们根据三个被忽略的维度对文献进行了回顾:(1)自动KBS与非自动KBS的区别; (2)所涉及决策的类型和重要性; (3)所需的数据采集类型。牢记这三个方面,我们回顾了有关KBS接受及其使用的文献,并指出大多数观察结果可以沿这三个方面进行解释。此外,这些方面使我们能够解释一些在交互性至关重要的科学领域中已经指出的失败和困难,例如决策支持系统(DSS)。我们的方法为KBS接受问题带来了一些新见解,并引导我们提出了一些建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号