首页> 外文会议>Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; 4166 >Assessment of Hazard Identification Methods for the Automotive Domain
【24h】

Assessment of Hazard Identification Methods for the Automotive Domain

机译:评估汽车领域的危害识别方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Many automotive electronic systems are safety related and therefore need to be developed using a safety process. A preliminary hazard analysis, PHA, is one of the first and vital steps in such a process. In this paper, two methods with different approaches are experimentally evaluated using an electrical steering column lock system. The two methods are an adapted FFA, functional failure analysis, method based on induction with generic failure modes and a method from ESA based on induction with generic low level hazards. In the evaluation, interviews and questionnaires are used to triangulate the results. Both methods are found to be applicable for hazard identification in the automotive system context. The experiments conducted also show, with statistical significance, that the adapted FFA method is less time consuming and easier to use than the ESA method. Hence, the FFA method is found to be more suitable for hazard identification in early phases of development in this context.
机译:许多汽车电子系统与安全有关,因此需要使用安全过程进行开发。初步危害分析PHA是该过程中的首要步骤之一。在本文中,使用电动转向柱锁系统对两种方法的不同方法进行了实验评估。这两种方法分别是适应性FFA,功能故障分析,基于具有通用故障模式的归纳方法和来自ESA的基于具有通用低水平危害的归纳方法。在评估中,使用访谈和问卷调查对结果进行三角测量。发现这两种方法都适用于汽车系统环境中的危害识别。进行的实验还具有统计学意义,表明改进的FFA方法比ESA方法耗时少且易于使用。因此,在这种情况下,发现FFA方法更适合在开发的早期阶段进行危害识别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号