首页> 外文会议>US Combustion Meeting; 20070325-28; San Diego,CA(US) >Comparison of Differential-Diffusion Effects in Flamelet Models for Combustion with Normal and Oxygen-Enriched Air
【24h】

Comparison of Differential-Diffusion Effects in Flamelet Models for Combustion with Normal and Oxygen-Enriched Air

机译:正常和富氧空气燃烧的小火焰模型中的扩散扩散效应比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Increased attention to fuel costs and CO_2 emissions in industrial combustion processes has led to renewed interest in oxygen-enriched combustion as a means of reducing energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions. In many cases, optimal benefits are achieved by increasing the oxygen concentration in the combustion air from 21% to about 30%. While many industrial studies have documented process benefits associated with oxygen-enriched combustion, there have been few technical studies addressing fundamental combustion science issues resulting from oxygen enrichment. In particular, there have been no studies to date examining the effect of oxygen enrichment on differential-diffusion effects, which introduce errors in flamelet models used for mixing-chemistry coupling in simulations of industrial combustion processes. Flamelet libraries are most commonly computed via equilibrium calculators like CEA, in which there are no spatial gradients and thus no differential diffusion. An alternative is to incorporate differential diffusion via the equilibrium limit of a one-dimensional opposed-flow diffusion flame calculated using OPPDIF. The resulting one-dimensional spatial gradients allow differential diffusion among individual chemical species and temperature, and thus the flamelet library differs from that obtained via CEA. An open question is whether differences in CEA and OPPDIF flamelet libraries are sufficiently large that the choice of flamelet library is a substantial contributor to the overall accuracy of the combustion process simulation. The present results clarify this by comparing chemical species fields Y_i(x,t) and reaction rate fields w_i(x,t) obtained from flamelet libraries generated with CEA and OPPDIF. It does so for both normal (21% O_2) combustion air and for oxygen- enriched (30% O_2) combustion air, to examine the effects of oxygen enrichment on differential diffusion effects in the flamelet approach. This allows conclusions to be drawn regarding the importance of differential diffusion effects in flamelet libraries. By comparing results for both normal (21% O_2) and oxygen-enriched (30% O_2) combustion air, the present results allow conclusions to be drawn regarding the effects of oxygen enrichment on differential diffusion in the flamelet simulations of combustion processes.
机译:在工业燃烧过程中,人们对燃料成本和CO_2排放的关注日益增加,引起了人们对富氧燃烧作为降低能源成本和温室气体排放的一种新的兴趣。在许多情况下,通过将燃烧空气中的氧气浓度从21%增加到大约30%,可以获得最佳利益。尽管许多工业研究已记录了与富氧燃烧相关的过程益处,但很少有技术研究解决由富氧引起的基本燃烧科学问题。特别是,迄今为止,还没有研究研究氧气富集对微分扩散效应的影响,这在用于工业燃烧过程模拟的混合化学耦合的小火焰模型中引入了误差。火焰小库通常通过CEA之类的平衡计算器进行计算,其中没有空间梯度,因此也没有差分扩散。一种替代方法是通过使用OPPDIF计算的一维对流扩散火焰的平衡极限来合并微分扩散。生成的一维空间梯度允许各个化学物质和温度之间的差异扩散,因此,小火焰库与通过CEA获得的小火焰库不同。一个悬而未决的问题是,CEA和OPPDIF小火焰库中的差异是否足够大,以至于小火焰库的选择对燃烧过程仿真的整体准确性起着重要作用。本结果通过比较化学物种字段Y_i(x,t)和反应速率字段w_i(x,t)(使用CEA和OPPDIF生成的小火焰库获得)来澄清这一点。对于普通(21%O_2)的燃烧空气和富氧(30%O_2)的燃烧空气都可以这样做,以检查小火焰方法中富氧对微分扩散效应的影响。这使得可以得出结论,即小火焰库中微分扩散效应的重要性。通过比较正常(21%O_2)和富氧(30%O_2)燃烧空气的结果,本结果可以得出结论,即在燃烧过程的小火焰模拟中,富氧对微分扩散的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点 San DiegoCA(US)
  • 作者

    N.Ninomiya; W.J.A. Dahm;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Energy and Environmental Science, Utsunomiya University 7-1-2 Yoto, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, 321-8585 JAPAN;

    Laboratory for Turbulence Combustion, Department of Aerospace Engineering The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2140 USA;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号