首页> 外文会议>Biometrics (ICB), 2012 5th IAPR International Conference on >LivDet 2011 — Fingerprint liveness detection competition 2011
【24h】

LivDet 2011 — Fingerprint liveness detection competition 2011

机译:LivDet 2011 — 2011指纹活度检测比赛

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

“Liveness detection”, a technique used to determine the vitality of a submitted biometric, has been implemented in fingerprint scanners in recent years. The goal for the LivDet 2011 competition is to compare software-based fingerprint liveness detection methodologies (Part 1), as well as fingerprint systems which incorporate liveness detection capabilities (Part 2), using a standardized testing protocol and large quantities of spoof and live fingerprint images. This competition was open to all academic and industrial institutions which have a solution for either software-based or system-based fingerprint vitality detection problem. Five submissions across the two parts of the competition resulted in successful completion. These submissions were: Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Automation (CASIA), Federico II University (Federico) and Dermalog Identification SystemsGmbH (Dermalog) for Part 1: Algorithms, and GreenBit and Dermalog for Part 2: Systems. Part 1 was evaluated using four different datasets. The best results were from Federico on the Digital Persona dataset with error for live and spoof detection of 6.2% and 11.61% respectively. The best overall results for Part 1 were Dermalog with 34.05 FerrFake and 11.825% FerrLive. Part 2 was evaluated using live subjects and spoof finger casts. The best results were from Dermalog with an error for live and spoof of 42.5% and 0.8%, respectively.
机译:近年来,已在指纹扫描仪中实施了“活力检测”,这是一种用于确定提交的生物识别信息的活力的技术。 LivDet 2011竞赛的目标是比较使用基于软件的指纹活动性检测方法(第1部分)以及使用标准测试协议以及大量欺骗和活动指纹的,具有活动性检测功能的指纹系统(第2部分)。图片。这项竞赛向所有具有基于软件或基于系统的指纹活力检测问题解决方案的学术和工业机构开放。竞赛两部分共提交了五份意见书,从而成功完成了比赛。这些材料是:中国科学院自动化研究所(CASIA),费德里科II大学(Federico)和Dermalog识别系统有限公司(Dermalog)的第1部分:算法,以及GreenBit和Dermalog的第2部分:系统。第1部分使用四个不同的数据集进行了评估。最好的结果来自Federico在Digital Persona数据集上的实时和欺骗检测错误,分别为6.2%和11.61%。第1部分的最佳总体结果是Dermalog以及34.05 FerrFake和11.825%FerrLive。第2部分使用现场受试者和恶搞的手指模型进行了评估。最佳结果来自Dermalog,实况和欺骗的误差分别为42.5%和0.8%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号