首页> 外文会议>ASME/ASCE/IEEE joint rail conference 2011 >STATISTICAL SAFE BRAKING ANALYSIS
【24h】

STATISTICAL SAFE BRAKING ANALYSIS

机译:统计安全制动分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The main objective in optimizing train control is to eliminate the waist associated with classical design where train separation is determined through the use of "worst case" assumptions that are invariant to the system. In fact, the worst case approach has been in place since the beginning of train control systems. Worst case takes the most conservative approach to the determination of train stopping distance, which is the basis for design of virtually all train control. This leads to stopping distances that could be far more that actually required under the circumstances at the time the train is attempting to brake. Modern train control systems are designed to separate trains in order to provide safety of operation while increasing throughput. Calculations for the minimum distance that separates trains have traditionally been based on the sum of a series of worst case scenarios. The implication was that no train could ever exceed this distance in stopping. This distance is called Safe Braking Distance (SBD). SBD has always been calculated by static parameters that were assumed to be invariant. This is, however, not the case. Parameters such as adhesion, acceleration, weight, and reaction vary over time, location or velocity. Since the worst case is always used in the calculation, inefficiencies result in this methodology which causes degradation in capacity and throughput. This is also true when mixed traffic with different stopping characteristics are present at the same time. The classic theory in train control utilizes a SBD model to describe the characteristics of a stopping train. Since knowledge of these conditions is not known, poor conditions are assumed. A new concept in train control utilizes statistical analysis and estimation to provide knowledge of the conditions. Trains operating along the line utilize these techniques to understand inputs into their SBD calculation. This provides for a SBD calculation on board the train that is the shortest possible that maintains the required level of safety. The new SBD is a prime determinant in systems capacity. Therefore by optimizing SBD as describes, system capacity is also optimized. The system continuously adjusts to changing conditions.
机译:优化列车控制的主要目标是消除与经典设计相关的腰部,在经典设计中,通过使用系统不变的“最坏情况”假设来确定列车间距。实际上,自列车控制系统开始以来,最坏的情况已经出现。最坏的情况是采用最保守的方法来确定列车停止距离,这是设计几乎所有列车控制系统的基础。这导致停车距离可能远远超过火车试图制动时的实际要求。现代火车控制系统设计用于分隔火车,以在增加吞吐量的同时提供运行安全性。传统上,分隔火车的最小距离的计算是基于一系列最坏情况的总和。言外之意是,任何火车在停车时都不能超过该距离。该距离称为安全制动距离(SBD)。 SBD始终由假定为不变的静态参数计算得出。但是,事实并非如此。诸如附着力,加速度,重量和反应之类的参数随时间,位置或速度而变化。由于在计算中始终使用最坏的情况,因此这种方法效率低下,从而导致容量和吞吐量下降。当同时存在具有不同停车特性的混合交通时,也是如此。列车控制中的经典理论利用SBD模型来描述列车的停止特性。由于不了解这些条件,因此假定条件很差。列车控制中的新概念利用统计分析和估计来提供有关状况的知识。沿线运行的列车利用这些技术来了解其SBD计算中的输入。这提供了火车上SBD的计算,该计算是最短的,可以维持所需的安全级别。新的SBD是系统容量的主要决定因素。因此,通过如上所述优化SBD,系统容量也得到了优化。系统会不断调整以适应不断变化的条件。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点 Pueblo CO(US);Pueblo CO(US)
  • 作者

    David F. Thurston;

  • 作者单位

    Temple University and Vice President and Deputy Sector Manager Parsons Transportation Group 1601 Market Street, 9~(th) Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 铁路运输;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-26 14:08:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号