【24h】

NURTURING CREATIVITY AND DESIGN TEACHING: ARE WE DOING ALL WE CAN?

机译:培养创造力和设计教学:我们正在尽力吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, we report on the results trom a qualitative study of six exemplary engineering programs focusing on the ways and the extent of nurturing creativity in engineering students. The study (P360: Prototyping the Engineering of 2020) included data collection from students, faculty, and administrators at the six institutions. This data collection focused mainly on three student outcomes, including design and problem solving. Creativity and how creativity was nurtured, both inside the classroom and outside, often emerged as a major theme. We also support our qualitative findings with quantitative data. Overall, the results indicate that although students improve their creativity in design settings, this result is mostly a by-product of design teaching, and creativity is not taught per se. Quantitative results show that program emphasis on creativity and innovation significantly correlates to skill levels in design problem solving, interdisciplinarity, contextual awareness, and recognizing perspectives. Qualitative data provide supporting evidence for this.
机译:在本文中,我们通过对六个示范性工程计划的定性研究报告了结果,重点是培养工程专业学生创造力的方式和程度。这项研究(P360:2020年的工程原型)包括从六个机构的学生,教职员工和管理人员收集的数据。数据收集主要集中在三个学生的成绩上,包括设计和解决问题。在教室内外,创造力以及如何培养创造力,经常成为一个主要主题。我们还通过定量数据来支持定性发现。总体而言,结果表明,尽管学生在设计环境中提高了创造力,但这种结果大部分是设计教学的副产品,而创新本身并没有被教授。定量结果表明,对创造力和创新的重视程度与解决设计问题,跨学科,情境意识和认知观点的技能水平显着相关。定性数据为此提供了支持证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号