首页> 外文会议>Artificial intelligence applications and innovations >Efficiency Comparison of Unstable Transductive and Inductive Conformal Classifiers
【24h】

Efficiency Comparison of Unstable Transductive and Inductive Conformal Classifiers

机译:不稳定的感应和共形分类器的效率比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the conformal prediction literature, it appears axiomatic that transductive conformal classifiers possess a higher predictive efficiency than inductive conformal classifiers, however, this depends on whether or not the nonconformity function tends to overfit misclassi-fied test examples. With the conformal prediction framework's increasing popularity, it thus becomes necessary to clarify the settings in which this claim holds true. In this paper, the efficiency of transductive conformal classifiers based on decision tree, random forest and support vector machine classification models is compared to the efficiency of corresponding inductive conformal classifiers. The results show that the efficiency of conformal classifiers based on standard decision trees or random forests is substantially improved when used in the inductive mode, while conformal classifiers based on support vector machines are more efficient in the transductive mode. In addition, an analysis is presented that discusses the effects of calibration set size on inductive conformal classifier efficiency.
机译:在保形预测文献中,似乎不合理的是,转导性保形分类器比归纳保形性分类器具有更高的预测效率,但是,这取决于不合格函数是否倾向于过度拟合错误分类的测试示例。随着共形预测框架的日益普及,因此有必要弄清该主张成立的背景。本文将基于决策树,随机森林和支持向量机分类模型的转导共形分类器的效率与相应的归纳共形分类器的效率进行了比较。结果表明,在归纳模式下使用时,基于标准决策树或随机森林的共形分类器的效率大大提高,而在支持模式下基于支持向量机的共形分类器效率更高。另外,提出了一种分析,该分析讨论了校准集大小对归纳保形分类器效率的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号