首页> 外文会议>Annual Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar(CASS); 20040427-29; Tucson,AZ(US) >Conflict Management: Warranted vs. Unwarranted Conflict in the Cockpit
【24h】

Conflict Management: Warranted vs. Unwarranted Conflict in the Cockpit

机译:冲突管理:座舱中的应有与无应有的冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The study of any physical system, such as an engine or an airplane, usually begins with a description of that system. Information about component parts, their location and dimensions, and terminology is a necessary background for later examination and understanding of the system design and operation. Our study of the "human factor" in aviation begins in a similar way. The "system," in this case, is conflict management. We, as humans, are action/reaction machines and we are not, as a pilot group, professionally trained in conflict management, let alone conflict resolution. The cockpit is not the best venue for "trial and error" conflict management learning. The University of Texas Human Factors Research Project's Line Oriented Safety Audit (LOSA) studies reveal that 80% of cockpit conflict is resolved. Can we improve upon the very disconcerting 20% of conflict that goes unresolved, possibly resulting in a less-than-optimal crew climate or worse, undesired flight safety consequences?
机译:对任何物理系统(例如发动机或飞机)的研究通常始于对该系统的描述。有关组件零件,它们的位置和尺寸以及术语的信息是以后检查和理解系统设计和操作的必要背景。我们对航空中“人为因素”的研究以类似的方式开始。在这种情况下,“系统”是冲突管理。作为人类,我们是行动/反应机器,而作为一个试点小组,我们没有经过冲突管理方面的专业培训,更不用说解决冲突了。座舱不是进行“反复试验”冲突管理学习的最佳场所。德克萨斯大学人为因素研究项目的面向行安全审核(LOSA)研究表明,座舱冲突中的80%得到解决。我们能否改善无法解决的非常令人不安的20%的冲突,这可能会导致机组人员的工作环境欠佳,或更糟糕的不希望的飞行安全后果?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号