首页> 外文会议>American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME) Turbo Expo vol.2; 20040614-17; Vienna(AT) >METRICS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCURACY OF DIAGNOSTIC FAULT DETECTION SYSTEMS
【24h】

METRICS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCURACY OF DIAGNOSTIC FAULT DETECTION SYSTEMS

机译:评价诊断故障检测系统准确性的指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper presents a method for providing metrics to evaluate the accuracy and cost effectiveness of diagnostic decision support systems. One intention of engine health management (EHM) fault detection systems is to have engines identified for removal and refurbishment as soon as there is evidence of an adverse gas generator trend shift. The benefits of EHM diagnostics and prognostics tests are derived from the resulting improved safety, the reduced operating costs, and most importantly, the good will and trust of the customer. The method presented in this paper is a generalized way of evaluating the performance of some of the tests that are used to make inspection, removal, and maintenance decisions [Ref 1,2] The detection of faults from shifts in classification data is the first step in EHM systems that use diagnostics and prognostics [Ref 3,4,5]. The minimum parameter shift required to trigger a fault indication is called the threshold. Typically, it is a predetermined multiple of the standard deviation of the parameter measurements. Root cause isolation is usually invoked following these detection tests for the gas path parameter shifts. This paper shows how the achievable accuracy of diagnostic and prognostic system tests can be determined from the signal to noise ratio (SNR), and the system's design (sensitivity and specificity). From these tests we extract two features, true positives (TP) and false positives (FP) that can be used to compare the accuracy of any simple or complex decision support system. This method is conducive to efficiently handling large amounts of data from multiple sensor tests because it avoids explicit correlation among individual diagnostic tests, and focuses instead on the net results. Each piece of classification information is used to reduce ambiguity. In this approach, the individual diagnostic tests and any data fusion weighting factors can be parametrically varied to optimize the accuracy of the decisions. The resulting plot of TP versus FP is then directly compared to the results of simple idealized classifier systems having known SNRs. This paper applies the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) process to evaluate the potential accuracy of EHM decisions. The paper also shows that the actual accuracy depends on how thresholds are set, and on the local shape of the ROC in the regions where it is used. The method presented can be applied to test the relative accuracy of each phase of the EHM decision-making process. The effects of test accuracies, event probabilities, and consequential event costs on the value of the decision support system are also presented.
机译:本文提出了一种提供度量以评估诊断决策支持系统的准确性和成本效益的方法。发动机健康管理(EHM)故障检测系统的一个目的是,一旦有不利的气体发生器趋势变化的迹象,便立即确定要拆卸和翻新的发动机。 EHM诊断和预后测试的好处来自安全性的提高,运营成本的降低以及最重要的是客户的良好信誉和信任。本文介绍的方法是评估用于做出检查,移除和维护决策的某些测试的性能的通用方法[参考1,2]从分类数据移位中检测故障是第一步。在使用诊断和预测的EHM系统中[Ref 3,4,5]。触发故障指示所需的最小参数偏移称为阈值。通常,它是参数测量值的标准偏差的预定倍数。通常在这些检测测试之后调用根本原因隔离措施以检测气路参数偏移。本文展示了如何从信噪比(SNR)以及系统的设计(灵敏度和特异性)确定诊断和预后系统测试可达到的精度。从这些测试中,我们提取了两个特征,即真阳性(TP)和假阳性(FP),可用于比较任何简单或复杂的决策支持系统的准确性。这种方法有利于有效地处理来自多个传感器测试的大量数据,因为它避免了各个诊断测试之间的显式关联,而侧重于最终结果。每条分类信息用于减少歧义。在这种方法中,可以对各个诊断测试和任何数据融合加权因子进行参数更改,以优化决策的准确性。然后将TP与FP的结果图直接与具有已知SNR的简单理想化分类器系统的结果进行比较。本文应用接收机工作特性(ROC)过程来评估EHM决策的潜在准确性。该论文还表明,实际精度取决于阈值的设置方式以及ROC在使用它的区域中的局部形状。提出的方法可用于测试EHM决策过程每个阶段的相对准确性。还介绍了测试准确性,事件概率和相应事件成本对决策支持系统价值的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号