首页> 外文会议>5th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Vol.2, Nov 27-Dec 1, 2000, Osaka, Japan >Expert Judgement of uncertainties in modelling emergency actions after nuclear accidents
【24h】

Expert Judgement of uncertainties in modelling emergency actions after nuclear accidents

机译:核事故后应急行动建模的不确定性专家判断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Sheltering, evacuation and distribution of stable iodine tablets are considered to be major early emergency actions aiming at diminishing the consequences after a release of radioactive materials from nuclear power plants into the air. Whether in real situations emergency managers will act accordingly is hard to predict. Uncertainties associated with these decisions are termed "volitional" uncertainties. These uncertainties, however, cannot be assessed by export judgements as they express the decision at stake in an emergency situation. Uncertainties on the times to implement countermeasures and on the times for the general population to respond to these measures can be assessed by experts, as they represent "lack-of-knowledge" uncertainties. This paper describes the difference in approach of both types of uncertainties and shows the results of expert judgements on the latter type of uncertainties in early emergency actions. Ten experts from seven European countries provided subjective assessments.
机译:稳定,安全的碘片的庇护,撤离和分发被认为是主要的早期紧急行动,旨在减少放射性物质从核电站释放到空中后的后果。在现实情况下,应急管理人员是否会采取相应行动很难预测。与这些决策相关的不确定性称为“自愿性”不确定性。但是,这些不确定性无法通过出口判断来评估,因为它们表达了在紧急情况下的决定性决定。专家可以评估实施对策的时间不确定性以及一般民众对这些措施做出响应的时间不确定性,因为它们代表着“缺乏知识”的不确定性。本文描述了两种不确定性方法的差异,并展示了专家对早期紧急行动中后一种不确定性的判断结果。来自七个欧洲国家的十位专家提供了主观评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号