首页> 外文会议>54th annual conference of the International Society for the Systems Sciences 2010 : Governance for a resilient planet >ONTOLOGICAL SUPPORT FOR MULTIPARADIGM MULTIMETHODOLOGIES: ISOMORPHIC PROCESS-STRUCTURES AND THE CRITICAL MOMENT
【24h】

ONTOLOGICAL SUPPORT FOR MULTIPARADIGM MULTIMETHODOLOGIES: ISOMORPHIC PROCESS-STRUCTURES AND THE CRITICAL MOMENT

机译:多范式多方法的本体论支持:同构过程结构和关键时刻

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Because it still lacks adequate theory needed to ground its multiparadigm multimethodologies, critical systems practice has been derisively called "theoretically-contradictory eclecticism". This paper is an introduction to and overview of the author's forthcoming Ph.D. dissertation which offers a new framework for research in critical systems thinking and proposes a new approach for the practice of critical systemic intervention. To underpin this framework an ontology of process-structure isomorphies is designed as a metaphysical interface through an abstraction called the critical moment to each of the conventional paradigms of critical systems thinking (functionalist, interpretivist, emancipatory and postmodern). The ontology is realised by a new epistemology (its raison d'etre) that respects paradigm incommensurability and yet exploits all the advantages to be had from a multiparadigmatic perspectivity. The new methodology, (wherein each of the paradigmatic approaches is critically 'deployed') then operationalises and completes the new framework. This new approach calls for and directs the systemist's critically reflexive, axiologically transparent, multiparadigmatic appreciation of, and multimethodological engagement with, the problem situation and flux. The philosophy necessarily lays out the framework's foundational motives, rationale, intents and purposes and acts as a guide for its use. The principal advantage of this new approach is derived from its critically-grounded multiparadigmatic perspectivity and the consequent leveraging of the full gamut of existing systemic methodologies and best practices.
机译:由于它仍然缺乏建立其多范式多方法论所需的足够理论,因此批评性的系统实践被嘲讽地称为“理论上矛盾的折衷主义”。本文是作者即将发表的博士学位的简介和概述。论文为关键系统思想的研究提供了新的框架,并为关键系统干预的实践提出了一种新的方法。为了支撑这个框架,过程-结构同构的本体通过称为抽象的关键时刻的抽象被设计为形而上学的接口,该关键时刻是关键系统思维的每个常规范式(功能主义者,解释主义者,解放主义者和后现代主义者)。本体是通过一种新的认识论(其存在理由)实现的,这种认识论尊重范式的不可通约性,但是却利用了多范式的透视性所具有的所有优势。然后,新的方法论(其中每种范式方法都被严格地“部署”了)并实施并完善了新框架。这种新方法要求并指导系统主义者对问题的状况和变化进行批判性的反思,价值论上的透明,多范式的理解以及多方法论的介入。该哲学必须阐明框架的基本动机,基本原理,意图和目的,并作为框架使用的指南。这种新方法的主要优势来自其严格扎根的多范式视角,并因此充分利用了现有系统方法论和最佳实践的全部范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号