首页> 外文会议>44th Society for Technical Communication annual conference >A Comparative Analysis of Heuristic and Usability Evaluation Methods
【24h】

A Comparative Analysis of Heuristic and Usability Evaluation Methods

机译:启发式和可用性评估方法的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Usability testing and heuristic evaluation are two methods for detecting usability problems, or bugs in software user interfaces. Usability testing identifies bugs that impair user performance. It provides a realistic context for the product evaluation, whereas heuristic evaluation does not. Further, it provides an estimate of bug severity, while heuristic evaluation does not. To its detriment, usability testing is more expensive and time intensive than heuristic evaluation. It also tends to overlook bugs that may not affect user performance but may negatively impact the user's perception of product quality. Recently, we have incorporated the best features of these two methods into one procedure which seems to work better than either method alone.
机译:可用性测试和启发式评估是检测可用性问题或软件用户界面中的错误的两种方法。可用性测试可识别会损害用户性能的错误。它为产品评估提供了现实的环境,而启发式评估则没有。此外,它提供了错误严重性的估计,而启发式评估则没有。相对于启发式评估,可用性测试更昂贵,更耗时,这是不利的。它还倾向于忽略那些可能不会影响用户性能但可能会对用户对产品质量的看法产生负面影响的错误。最近,我们将这两种方法的最佳功能整合到一个过程中,该过程似乎比单独使用任何一种方法都更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号