首页> 外文会议>3rd British Geotechnical Association Geoenvironmental Engineering Conference Sep 17-19, 2001 Edinburgh, Scotland >Comparison of leachate attenuation characteristics of colliery spoils in field, column and batch tests
【24h】

Comparison of leachate attenuation characteristics of colliery spoils in field, column and batch tests

机译:在现场,柱子和批次试验中比较煤矿弃渣的渗滤液衰减特性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Waste Management paper 26B (DoE, 1995) recognises the validity of site specific designs to remove the leachate hazard to surface and ground water posed by landfills, and thus decrease the problem of "over engineering" of low-risk landfill sites. This includes the consideration of materials in landfill systems to attenuate the hazardous components of leachate before they reach vulnerable ground or surface waters. The process of leachate attenuation includes; physical (e.g. dilution), physicochemical (e.g. sorption, ion exchange), chemical (e.g., precipitation and complexation), and microbial (e.g. degradation). However, before leachate attenuation is considered in the risk assessment procedure for andfill design a thorough understanding of the processes governing the attenuation of leachate are required. Coal mining and associated coal utilising industries have led to waste material often referred to as colliery spoil. Colliery spoils have been used in construction of landfill liners due to the large redundant volumes of little economic use. However, previous investigations into the attenuation capacity of spoil are limited, and due to its inherent variability a large number of samples may need to be tested during material selection to ensure adequate performance. Rapidity of the test becomes significant when comparing a large lumber of samples, which would be the case during material selection in the quality assurance phase of landfill liner construction. The two main types of laboratory test used in leachate attenuation investigations are batch equilibrium and column flow tests. Both tests are used to obtain contaminant retention parameters for use in risk assessment studies of contaminant transport from landfill sites. Laboratory tests are more frequently performed than field based tests due to better control on the test conditions and relative ease of test monitoring Batch tests are routinely used in the laboratory in preference to column tests because of the relatively short test time, reduced need for leachant sample analysis, and better test precision. However, column tests are considered to be more realistic than batch tests in determining sorption parameters since they simulate the migration of contaminants in the field more accurately. This paper aims to discuss the use of batch and column tests for assessing colliery spoil as a leachate attenuating material within landfill liner systems. The results of a large-scale field test are also presented for comparison with laboratory test results.
机译:废物管理文件26B(美国能源部,1995年)认识到特定地点设计的有效性,以消除渗滤液对垃圾填埋场造成的地表水和地下水的危害,从而减少了低风险垃圾填埋场的“过度工程化”问题。这包括考虑垃圾掩埋系统中的材料,以在渗滤液到达脆弱的地下水或地表水之前将其衰减。渗滤液衰减的过程包括:物理(例如稀释),物理化学(例如吸附,离子交换),化学(例如沉淀和络合)和微生物(例如降解)。但是,在填充设计的风险评估程序中考虑渗滤液衰减之前,需要对控制渗滤液衰减的过程有透彻的了解。煤矿开采和相关的煤炭利用行业导致了通常被称为煤矿废料的废料。由于大量多余物而很少经济使用,煤矿废料已用于垃圾填埋场衬砌的建设。但是,以前对弃土衰减能力的研究是有限的,并且由于其固有的可变性,在材料选择过程中可能需要测试大量样品以确保足够的性能。当比较大量的样品时,测试的速度变得非常重要,在垃圾填埋场衬砌施工质量保证阶段的材料选择过程中就是这种情况。渗滤液衰减研究中使用的两种主要的实验室测试类型是间歇平衡测试和柱流测试。两种测试均用于获得污染物保留参数,以用于对从垃圾填埋场运输污染物的风险评估研究。由于对测试条件的更好控制和相对容易的测试监控,使得实验室测试比基于现场的测试更频繁地进行,因为相对来说测试时间相对较短,减少了对沥滤样品的需求,因此在实验室中,批次测试通常优先于柱测试。分析,并提高测试精度。但是,在确定吸附参数时,认为柱试验比间歇试验更现实,因为它们可以更准确地模拟污染物在野外的迁移。本文旨在讨论使用批处理和立柱测试来评估煤矿垃圾作为垃圾填埋衬垫系统中渗滤液衰减材料的情况。还提供了大规模现场测试的结果,以便与实验室测试结果进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号